Журналы →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2015 →  №9 →  Назад

ECONOMY, ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
Название Geomechanical audit — assessment tool for geological conditions in underground mining
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2015.09.11
Автор Louchnikov V. N., Pitman W., Eremenko V. A.
Информация об авторе

Author 1:
Name & Surname: Louchnikov V. N.
Company: AMC Mining Consultants (Vancouver, Canada)
Work Position: Principal Mining Engineer

 

Author 2:
Name & Surname: Pitman W.
Company: AMC Mining Consultants (Vancouver, Canada)
Work Position: Director


Author 3:
Name & Surname: Eremenko V. A.
Company: Institute of Comprehensive Exploitation of Mineral Resources—IPKON, Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russia)
Work Position: Principal Researcher
Scientific Degree: Doctor of Engineering Sciences
Contacts: eremenko@ngs.ru

Реферат

For estimation of ground control efficiency and detection of gaps on geological and geomechanical control in an underground mine, this article presents a review of international experience gained in geomechanical auditing in underground mines in Australia, Russian Federation, Kazakhstan, South America and Africa. The goal of the geomechanical audit is to make certain that the ground control in a mine is efficient and consistent with international standards. To this effect, the geological conditions in an underground mine are analyzed along different lines of research. The audit results are delivered as a rating of consistency with the mining standards. Based on the analysis outcomes, the consistency coefficient is determined. The rating is given relative to the audit as a whole and relative to its individual sections. As a result, the gaps are indentified in the geotechnical control in a mine, and the relevant recommendations are made on removal of shortcomings per each gap. The geomechanical audit should be performed not less than once every three years. Usually, independent experts are invited to visit a mine for two–three days in order to have a look at the mine paperworks and to interview technical personnel and key employees such as director, geomechanics engineer, section foremen, etc. Furthermore, internal checks should be practices when geomechanics engineers of a company implement cross-audit at production units within the company. Such checks are not the guilty party hunting. It is extremely important that personnel talk sincerely and openly with an auditor since this is directly related with the mine safety, which is of concern for everyone on the staff. From the auditing experience, it is positive that low safety of mining generally ensues from systemic problems rather than from activity or inactivity of mine personnel. The geomechanical audit aims at disclosure of such problems.

Ключевые слова Geomechanical audit, auditor, underground mining, consistency coefficient, rock mass stress–strain state.
Библиографический список

1. Barton N. Application of Q-System and Index Tests to Estimate Shear Strength and Deformability of Rock Masses. Workshop on Norwegian Method of Tunneling. New Delhi, 1993. pp. 66–84.
2. Laubscher D. H. A geomechanics classification system for the rating of rock mass in mine design. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 1990. Vol. 90, No. 10. pp. 257–273.
3. Lushnikov V. N., Eremenko V. A., Sandy M. P., Bukher R. Kreplenie gornykh vyrabotok v usloviyakh deformiruemykh i udaroopasnykh massivov gornykh porod (Excavation support in the conditions of deformed and bump-hazard rock massifs). Gornyi Zhurnal = Mining Journal. 2014. No. 4. pp. 37–43.
4. Eremenko V. A., Lushnikov V. N., Sandy M. P., Shelukhin I. S. Otsenka sostoyaniya massiva gornykh porod krovli ochistnykh blokov v usloviyakh primeneniya kamerno-stolbovoy sistemy v kriolitozone (Assessment of the state of rock massif of stope roofs in the conditions of pillar-and-room method application in cryolithic zone). Gornyi Zhurnal = Mining Journal. 2015. No. 3. pp. 24–32.
5. Louchnikov V. N., Eremenko V. A., Sandy M. P. Ground support liners for underground mines: energy absorption capacities and costs. Eurasian Mining. 2014. No. 1. pp. 54–62.
6. Kaiser P. K., McCreath D. R., Tannant D. D. Canadian Rockburst Support Hand-book. Geomechanics Research Centre, MIRARCO. Canada, 1996. 324 p.
7. Ortlepp W. D. Rock Fracture and Rockbursts: an Illustrative Study. Monograph Series M9, SAIMM. Johannesburg, 1997.
8. Potvin Y., Giles G. The development of new high-energy absorption mesh. 10th AusIMM Underground Operators Conference. Launceston, Australia, 14–16 April, 2008. pp. 89–94.
9. Mine Safety Operations. Mine ground control management plan audit tool. Underground metalliferous mines. NSW Department of Primary Industries. MEX-009. September, 2008. 26 p.
10. Guide to open pit geotechnical considerations – HIF audit guideline. Department of Mines and Petroleum. Western Australia. 2009. 23 p.
11. Geotechnical considerations underground – HIF audit guideline. Department of Mines and Petroleum. Western Australia, 2003. 22 p.
12. Available at: http://base.garant.ru/70691622/ (in Russian)

Language of full-text русский
Полный текст статьи Получить
Назад