Журналы →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2020 →  №1 →  Назад

THEORETICAL ISSUES OF GEOMECHANICS
Название Methodology of integrated stability monitoring in mines
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2020.01.10
Автор Rybin V. V., Konstantinov K. N., Kagan M. M., Panasenko I. G.
Информация об авторе

Mining Institute, Kola Science Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Russia:

V. V. Rybin, Leading Researcher, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, rybin@goi.kolasc.net.ru
K. N. Konstantinov, Researcher
M. M. Kagan, Senior Researcher
I. G. Panasenko, Programming Supervisor

Реферат

Under conditions of gradual increase in the mining depth and long-term operation of open pit mine elements, infrastructure buildings and facilities (control objects) at mining and processing plants, considerable attention is paid to their integrated stability monitoring management. This article describes the major methodology of such monitoring in terms of the Kovdor Mining and Processing Plant. In view of the current mining of the main Zhelezny open pit to a depth of 850 m with partial cutback of pit walls, arrangement and improvement of geotechnical stability monitoring (pit walls and benches, buildings and facilities inside the pit and within its infrastructure site) is of the current concern. Each group of geotechnical objects possesses its peculiarities, based on which arrangement, functioning and procedural supervision of their safe and trouble-free operation is accomplished. Qualitatively, the monitoring system is represented by the information (databases, software programs, etc.) and objects (surface of pit walls and dumps, waterworks, etc.). The importance of the abilities of this system to integrate, automatically update incoming information, effectively organize data flows, to alert, etc. is highlighted. The organization chart of the system under operation with spatial information in the multi-user environment is represented by the server and user services. The server service includes bases of spatial information, subject information and GIS server. The user service is conditionally divided into work stations of operators of data sources and data users. The authors substantiate the necessity of using a fully functional professional GIS for an adequate solution of all tasks.
The authors express their special thanks to A. A. Danilkin, Technical Officer of the Kovdor Mining and Processing Plant, for the active participation in the creation and implementation of the system, as well as for the contribution to preparation of this article.

Ключевые слова Zhelezny open pit mine, monitoring, geotechnical object list, system components, integration ability, system architecture, geoinformation system, data sources, pit wall
Библиографический список

1. Kozyrev A. A., Panin V. I. Geomechanical prediction and monitoring at all stages of mineral mining – from planning and design to mine closure. Innovative trends in mine planning and design : collection of scientific papers. Saint-Petersburg, 2017. pp. 125–135.
2. Kasparyan E. V., Kozhukhovskiy A. V., Rozanov I. Yu. The organisation experience of open pit walls and benches stability monitoring. Izvestiya vuzov. Gornyi zhurnal. 2015. No. 5. pp. 67–74.
3. Melnikov N. N., Kalashnik A. I., Kalashnik N. A., Zaporozhets D. V. Integrated Multi-Level Geomonitoring of Natural-and-Technical Objects in the Mining Industry. Journal of Mining Science. 2018. Vol. 54, Iss. 4. pp. 535–540.
4. Danilkin A. A., Kozyrev A. A., Bocharov S. N., Rybin V. V. The promising concept of mining development at Kovdorsky GOK JSC. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2019. No. 6. pp. 30–34. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2019.06.03
5. Hartwig M. E. Detection of mine slope motions in Brazil as revealed by satellite radar interferograms. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and Environment. 2016. Vol. 75, Iss. 2. pp. 605–621.
6. Dyshlenko S. G. Corporate GIS generation based on spatial information data bases. Geoprofi. 2010. No. 1. pp. 13–15.
7. Zaki M. J., Vagner M. Jr. Data mining and analysis. Fundamental Concepts and Algorithms. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2014. 607 p.
8. Bar N., Nicoll S., Reynolds M., Bran D. Geotechnical data management and visualization systems: Meeting the data challenge of the 21st century and maximizing value for open pit mines. Geomechanics and Geodynamics of Rock Masses : Proceedings of the 2018 European Rock Mechanics Symposium. London : CRC Press, 2018. Vol. 2. pp. 973–978.
9. Melnikov N. N., Lukichev S. V., Nagovitsyn O. V. Ogy of engineering providing of mining on basis of mine-frame softwar. GIAB. 2 013. No. 9. pp. 223–233.
10. Melnikov D. Yu. Geoinformation platforms. Third edition. 2012. Available at: http://www.politerm.com.ru/articles/obzor_gis.pdf (accessed: 10.12.2019).
11. Nagovitsyn O. V., Lukichev S. V. Mining and geological information systems – History and stateofthe-art. Apatity : Izdatelstvo KNTs RAN, 2016. 196 p.
12. Masoud S. S., Parviz M., Ebrahim Y. Optimizing and slope determination of final wall for Maiduk Mine with consideration of destabilizer factors. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. 2016. Vol. 26, Iss. 3. pp. 501–509.
13. Batali L., Andreea C. Slope Stability Analysis Using the Unsaturated Stress Analysis. Case Study. Procedia Engineering. 2016. Vol. 143. pp. 284–291.

Language of full-text русский
Полный текст статьи Получить
Назад