VNIPIpromtekhnologii, Moscow, Russia:

V. V. Golovko, Production Manager, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Golovko.V.Vas@vnipipt.ru
E. Yu. Meshkov, Chief Specialist

Priargun Mining and Chemical Association, Krasnokamensk, Russia:

V. G. Litvinenko, Production Manager, Doctor of Engineering Sciences

Priargun Mining and Chemical Association has been producing uranium in the Streltsov ore field for more than 50 years. The main ore bodies with high content of uranium have been mined out during this period of time, and the uranium content has dropped in ore which is currently extracted. In connection with this, appraisal of the mineral resources and mineral reserves of Priargun MCA has been accomplished. The Argun ore is composed of a few process types—iron silicate and uranium, silicate–uranium–molybdenum, carbonate and uranium, carbonate and molybdenum, carbonate–uranium–molybdenum and rebellious ore (contains zirconium and brannerite). It is required to undertake technology-based rating and certification of the Argun ore. The autoclave leaching technology is found to be higher economically efficient as against the atmospheric leaching technology due to lower operating expenses. From the preliminary studies, four samples of anion-exchange resins are recommended for further testing: A500Y, BM77-14, D299 and Ambersep 920UXL SO4. These ion-exchangers were used to analyze their influence on sorption–desorption of uranium and molybdenum. All these ion exchangers had preserved their sorption capacity in 10 sorption–desorption cycles. Based on the studies into adsorption of uranium and molybdenum from leached slurry at the Argun deposit, the optimal sorbent for extraction and separation of uranium and molybdenum is Ambersep 920UXL SO4. Producibility of natural uranium to meet ASTM C 967-13 standards is analyzed on a laboratory scale. The produced uranium concentrate contains much less impurities than it is stipulated by International Standard Specification ASTM С 967-13.
The action chart of processing of carbonate ore from the Argun and Zherlovoe deposits is developed and economically justified.

1. Svyatetskiy V. S., Polonyankina S. V., Ermakov A. G. Uranium-mining industry of Russia: the state and prospects of development. Razvedka i okhrana nedr. 2017. No. 11. pp. 22–26.
2. Mashkovtsev G. A., Miguta A. K., Shchetochkin V. N. Uranium resource base. problems of exploration and development. Mineralnye resursy Rossii. Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2017. No. 3. pp. 67–78.
3. Balikhin A. V. Uranium mineral-resources: the current state and perspectives for development. Review. Kompleksnoe ispolzovanie mineralnogo syrya. 2019. No. 1(308). pp. 36–50.
4. Shatkov G. A. Streltsovska type uranium depoisits. Regionalnaya geologiya i metallogeniya. 2015. No. 63. pp. 85–96.
5. Tarkhanov A. V., Bugrieva E. P. Value and Prospects of Commercial Uranium Deposits. Moscow : VIMS, 2017. 106 p.
6. Govorin V. A. Research and development of integrated processing technology for fluoritebearing molybdenum and uranium ore: A case-study of the Zherlovoe and Argun deposits : Dissertation … of Candidate of Engineering Sciences. Krasnokamensk, 1990.
7. Smirnov K. M., Molchanova T. V., Akimova I. D., Krylova O. K. Efficient technology for Combinatd processing of silicate and carbonate uranium ores. Atomic Energy. 2018. Vol. 124, No. 2. pp. 111–117.
8. Meshkov E. Yu., Akimova I. D., Shchipanova R. S., Kochubeeva S. L. Sedimentation of chemical uranium concentrate in the type of peroxide in the scheme of direct uranium extraction from leaching solutions. Khimicheskaya tekhnologiya. 2014. Vol. 15, No. 4. pp. 227–231.
9. Akimova I. D., Meshkov E. Yu., Shchipanova R. S. Method of uranium ore processing. Patent RF, No. 2481411. Applied: 06.02.2012. Published: 10.05.2013. Bulletin No. 13.
10. Peganov V. A., Molchanova T. V., Akimova I. D., Zharova E. V. Technology for Obtaining Natural-Uranium Concentrates to ASTM C 967–08 Specifications. Atomic Energy. 2015. Vol. 117, No. 6. P. 415–421.
11. Konopleva L. V., Golubeva T. E., Sheremetev M. F., Shatalov V. V. Method of concentrating uranium from diluted solutions. Patent RF, No. 2404126. Applied: 09.02.2009. Published: 20.11.2010. Bulletin No. 32.
12. Kwang-Wook Kim, Jun-Taek Hyun, Keun-Young Lee, Eil-Hee Lee, Kune-Woo Lee et al. Effects of the different conditions of uranyl and hydrogen peroxide solutions on the behavior of the uranium peroxide precipitation. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2011. Vol. 193. pp. 52–58.
13. Mojica-Rodríguez L., Bertrand M., Gaillard J., Muhr H., Plasari E. et al. Study on uranium peroxide precipitation in a continuous fluidized-bed reactor with mechanical stirring. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2015. Vol. 293. pp. 150–158.
14. Rodgers C. C., Dyck B. Uranium peroxide precipipitate drying temperature relationships. Uranium 2010 “The future is U” : Proceedings of the 3^rd International Conference on Uranium, 40^th annual hydrometallurgy meeting. Saskatoon, 2010. Vol. 1. pp. 489–500.
15. Kopbaeva M. P., Panova E. N., N. A. Prinzin, Karmanov E. M. Optimization of uranium peroxide precipitation. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2016. No. 5. pp. 90–94. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2016.05.13
16. Makhatha M. E., Patience L. S. Leaching of uranium from coal by alkaline and mixture of sodium carbonate and sodium bi-carbonate. Proceedings of the 18^th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConferences. Albena, 2018. Vol. 18, Iss. 1.4. pp. 105–110.
17. Orozco I., Romero M., Lara R., Bazan V. Precipitation of uranium from alkaline liqueurs. Revista Matéria. 2018. Vol. 23, No. 2. DOI: 10.1590/S1517-707620180002.0345
18. Jianqiao Zhang, Qiang Tian, Qintang Li, Henderson M. J., Xianguo Tuo et al. Small-a ngle scattering model analysis of cage-like uranyl peroxide nanoparticles. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2019. Vol. 296. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111794