D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology оf Russia, Moscow, Russia¹; A. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia²:

E. G. Vinokurov, Professor^{1, 2}, Doctor of Chemical Sciences, e-mail: vin-62@muctr.ru

D. Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology оf Russia, Moscow, Russia:
T. F. Burukhina, Associate Professor, Candidate of Technical Sciences, e-mail: burukhina@bk.ru

Research Institute “Environmental Industrial Policy Centre”, Moscow, Russia:
I. S. Kuroshev, Department Head, e-mail: i.kuroshev@eipc.center

The distribution of coatings by the frequency of their application during surface treatment by electrochemical methods is considered. This is important not only for understanding the structure of the electrochemical surface treatment sector, but also for identifying priority areas of scientific and technical research. Nonparametric statistical methods show the uniformity of samples and reveal the relationship between the number of enterprises that sell a certain type of coating, i.e. the frequency of applying a certain type of coating in different countries (USA, Japan, Italy, France, Germany, Great Britain, Spain, Canada, Mexico, Russia, South Africa). The results of testing the hypothesis of a close relationship between the ranks of coatings showed that a significant correlation was found between the distribution of coatings by the frequency of their application (implementation) among all countries. For example, when comparing the United States and Canada, the rank correlation coefficient is 0.62 (the lowest value obtained), which is greater than the calculated critical value of 0.56; when comparing Italy and Spain, the correlation coefficient takes the highest value of 0.97, which is greater than the critical value of 0.19. The results obtained allowed us to use this data to compile a generalized rating of the frequency of use of all coatings based on data from different countries. Based on the analysis, metal coatings can be arranged in a row according to the descending frequency of their application: Cr > Ni > Zn > Cu > Cd. The results of the ranking of coatings showed that the most commonly used electrochemical methods for surface treatment are metal coatings with chromium and nickel, and among the inorganic non – metallic coatings-oxide and then phosphate, which allows us to highlight the research devoted to the application of these coatings as priority areas of scientific and technical research.

1. Larson C. After the recession — how is the metal finishing sector recovering? Transactions of the Institute of Metal Finishing. 2015. Vol. 93, No. 2. pp. 62–65. DOI: 10.1179/0020296715Z.000000000228.
2. Perelygin Yu. P. Some Environmental Problems in Electroplating Industry. Galvanotekhnika i Obrabotka Poverkhnosti. 2018. Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 57–61.
3. Vinokurov E. G., Burukhina T. F., Kolesnikov V. A., Fadina S. V. Сoncentration criterion for classifying resource-saving compositions of solutions for metal electroplating. Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering. 2012. Vol. 46, No. 5. pp. 486–491. DOI: 10.1134/S004057951205020X.
4. Chanturia V. A., Ignatkina V. A., Chanturia E. L Resource saving and environmental protection in the enrichment and processing of mineral raw materials. Tsvetnye Metally. 2017. No. 1. pp. 92–95.
5. Burukhina T. F., Vinokurov E. G., Napedenina E. Yu. Analysis of the distribution and the criteria of the recourse consumption of electrolytes at a total concentration of concentration of compounds. Galvanotekhnika i Obrabotka Poverkhnosti. 2019. Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 43–48.
6. Larson C. Comparisons of metal finishing sectors revisited: variations in some economic and structural factors. Transactions of the Institute of Metal Finishing. 2019. Vol. 97, No. 3. pp. 109–111. DOI: 10.1080/00202967.2019.1608711.
7. Larson C. Surface finishing industry — where is it all being done? Transactions of the IMF. 2017. Vol. 95, No. 5. pp. 233–234. DOI: 10.1080/00202967.2017.1351642.
8. Larson C. Global comparisons of metal finishing sectors: Part 2. Some technology and operational variations. Transactions of the Institute of Metal Finishing. 2012. Vol. 90, No. 5. pp. 232–236. DOI: 10.1179/0020296712Z.00000000054.
9. Kudryavtsev V. N. Some information about electroplating production in the United States. Galvanotekhnika i Obrabotka Poverkhnosti. 2003. Vol. 11, No. 4. P. 21.
10. Kolesnikov V. A., Kokarev G. A., Kamynina L. L., Kapustin YU. I. Ekologiya i resursosberezhenie v elektrohimicheskih proizvodstvah. M. : RHTU im. D. I. Mendeleeva, 1998. 54 p.
11. Smith J. R., Larson C. Statistical approaches in surface finishing. Part 2. Non-parametric methods for data analysis. Transactions of the Institute of Metal Finishing. 2019. Vol. 97, No. 1. pp. 5–10. DOI: 10.1080/00202967.2019.1555367.
12. Naselenie Zemli. — URL: https://countrymeters.info/ru/World (retrieved: 23.03.2020)
13. Vinogradova N. A., Fedorenko N. S. Analiz rabotosposobnosti parametricheskih i neparametricheskih pokazatelej korrelirovannosti. Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki. 2016. No. 7. pp. 61–65.
14. Vinokurov E. G., Meshalkin V. P., Vasilenko E. A., Nevmyatullina Kh. A. et al. System analysis of the efficiency and competitiveness of chroming technologies. Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering. 2016. Vol. 50, No. 5. pp. 730–738. DOI: 10.1134/S0040579516050389.