UMMC Technical University, Verkhnyaya Pyshma, Russia:

A. B. Lebed, Head of the Metallurgy Department, e-mail: a.lebed@tu-ugmk.com

Z. A. Lebed, Leading Specialist

UMMC Technical University, Verkhnyaya Pyshma, Russia¹ ; Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia²:
R. I. Verkhodanov, Leading Specialist¹, Postgraduate²

Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia:
D. I. Bludova, Assistant of the Department of Metallurgy of Non-ferrous Metals, Institute of New Materials and Technologies (INMT)

During the passage of atmospheric precipitates through the porous dump body, the products of oxidation of sulfide minerals are dissolved. As a result, underspoil waters with low pH values and a significant amount of dissolved metals are formed. For the most part, all types of the sewage produced by mining and processing enterprises (underspoil, colliery, pit, drainage) are combined before treatment, which leads to the formation of a common water yield with complex chemical composition. According to the existing practice, the combined flow is neutralized with lime milk, which leads to irretrievable losses of non-ferrous metals with mud after neutralization. The use of the sulfiding method as part of the tactics of locally autonomous processing makes it possible to obtain the copper and zinc commercial products suitable for further metallurgical processing. Previously, sulphides of biogenic or chemical nature, as well as hydrogen sulphide, have been used in extraction of metals in the form of sulphides. In this study, we have used sulfur solution in sodium hydroxide with a mass ratio of NaOH:S = 1:1 as an alternative to the old reagents. During the study, the sulfur consumption for copper and zinc extraction were determined. The impact of water pH on zinc extraction is shown. The pilot-scale tests have confirmed the results of laboratory studies. Proposed is a flow chart with the following main operations: copper extraction, zinc extraction and the zinc product conditioning. Copper concentrate with a copper content of 32.9% and zinc concentrate with a zinc content of 48% were obtained. In the resulting deposits, copper is in the form of covellite (CuS), and zinc is in the form of sphalerite (ZnS). Through metal extraction was 99.9% for copper and 99.5% for zinc.

1. Shulenina Z. M., Bagrov V. V., Desyatov A. V. Technogenic Water: Problems, Technologies, Resource Value. Moscow: MGTU, 2015. 401 p.
2. Modern Technologies of Processing of Technogenic Raw Materials. Ekaterinburg: AO “IPP” “Uralskiy Rabochiy”, 2019. 200 p.
3. Balakirev V. F., Aksenov V. I., Nichkova I. I., Krymskiy V. V. Treatment of Aggressive Industrial Wastes. Moscow: RAS, 2019. 115 p.
4. Fu F., Wang Q. Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Wastewaters: a Review. Journal of Environmental Management. 2011. Vol. 92, Is s. 3. pp. 407–418. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011.
5. Crini G, Lichtfouse E. Advantages and Disadvantages of Techniques Used for Wastewater Treatment. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2018. Vol. 17, Iss. 1. pp. 145–155. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-018-0785-9.
6. Carolin C. F., Kumar P. S., Saravanan A., Joshiba J., Naushad M. Efficient Techniques for the Removal of Toxic Heavy Metals from Aquatic Environment: a Review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2017. Vol. 5, Iss. 3. pp. 2782–2799. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.05.029.

7. Azimi A., Azari A., Rezakazemi M., Ansarpour M. Removal of Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewaters: a Review. ChemBioEng Reviews. 2017. Vol. 4, Iss. 1. pp. 37–59. DOI: 10.1002/cben.201600010.
8. Tarybaeva G. A., Orekhova N. N. Сopper and Zinc Selective Extraction from Sub-Basement Waters of Mining Enterprises into Precipitation. Aktuyalniye problemy gornogo dela. 2017. No. 2. pp. 44–52.
9. Medyanik N. L., Mishurina O. A., Mullina E. R., Smirnova A. V., Zaitseva E. V. The Comprehensive Processing Technology of Hydro-Technogenic Formations of Yellow Copper ore Mining Plants. Vestnik of Nosov Magnitogorsk
State Technical University. 2019. Vol. 17, Iss. 4. pp. 10–17. DOI: 10.18503/1995-2732-2019-17-4-10-17.
10. Tang X., Zheng H., Teng H., Sun Y., Guo J., Xie W., Yang Q., Chen W. Chemical Coagulation Process for the Removal of Heavy Metals from Water: a Review. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2016. Vol. 57, Iss. 4. pp. 1733–1748. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2014.977959.
11. Barbooti M. M., Abid B. A., Al-Shuwaiki N. M. Removal of Heavy Metals Using Chemicals Precipitation. Engineering and Technology Journal. 2011. Vol. 29, Iss. 3. pp. 595–612.
12. Barakat M. A. New Trends in Removing Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewater. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2011. Vol. 4, Iss. 4. pp. 361–377. DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.07.019.
13. Luptáková A., Ubaldini S., Macingová E., Fornari P., Giuliano V. Application of Physical–Chemical and Biological–Chemical Methods for Heavy Metals Removal from Acid Mine Drainage. Process Biochemistry. 2012. Vol. 47, Iss. 11. pp. 1633–1639. DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2012.02.025.
14. Burakov A. E., Galunin E. V., Burakova I. V., Kucherova A. E., Agarwal S., Tkachev A. G., Gupta V. K. Adsorption of Heavy Metals on Conventional And Nanostructured Materials for Wastewater Treatment Purposes: a Review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2018. Vol. 148. pp. 702–712. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.11.034.
15. Vardhan K. H., Kumar P. S., Panda R. C. A Review on Heavy Metal Pollution, Toxicity and Remedial Measures: Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2019. Vol. 290. 111197. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111197.
16. Ivanenko V. I., Korneykov R. I., Kesarev K. A., Zharov N. V. Purifying the Process Effluents from Heavy Metals and Arsenic Cations by Deposition and Ion Exchange. Tsvetnye Metally. 2018. No. 1. pp. 33–38. DOI: 10.17580/tsm.2018.01.04.
17. Klyushnikov A. M. Study of Copper and Zinc Extraction from Underspoil Water. Metallurgist. 2020. Vol. 63, Iss. 11-12. pp. 1135–1143. DOI: 10.1007/s11015-020-00933-w.
18. Kumar M., Nandi M., Pakshirajan K. Recent Advances in Heavy Metal Recovery from Wastewater by Biogenic Sulfide Precipitation. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021. Vol. 278. 111555. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111555.
19. Jiménez-Rodríguez A. M., Durán-Barrantes M. M., Borja R., Sánchez E., Colmenarejo M. F., Raposo F. Heavy Metals Removal from Acid Mine Drainage Water Using Biogenic Hydrogen Sulphide and Effluent from Anaerobic Treatment: Effect of pH. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2009. Vol. 165, Iss. 1-3. pp. 759–765. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.053.
20. Bilgin A., Jaffé P. R. Precipitation of Copper (II) in a Two-Stage Continuous Treatment System Using Sulfate Reducing Bacteria. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2019. Vol. 10, Iss. 10. pp. 2907–2914. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-018- 0329-3.
21. Estay H., Ruby-Figueroa R., Gim-Krumm M., Seriche G. Quilaqueo M., Díaz-Quezada S., Cortés I., Barros L. Changing the Conventional Clarification Method in Metal Sulfide Precipitation by a Membrane-Based Filtration Process. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2021. Vol. 11. pp. 693–709. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.034.
22. Menzel K., Barros L., García A., Ruby-Figueroa R., Estay H. Metal Sulfide Precipitation Coupled with Membrane Filtration Process for Recovering Copper from Acid Mine Drainage. Separation and Purification Technology. 2021. Vol. 270. 118721. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118721.
23. Wang, L. P., Chen Y. J. Sequential Precipitation of Iron, Copper, and Zinc from Wastewater for Metal Recovery. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 2019. Vol. 145, Iss. 1. 04018130. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001480.