Journals →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2025 →  #5 →  Back

RAW MATERIAL BASE
ArticleName Unconventional mineral resources (using the example of the Blyava opencast mining and dumping facility in the Southern Urals)
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2025.05.02
ArticleAuthor Ponomareva G. A., Petrishchev V. P.
ArticleAuthorData

Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russia

G. A. Ponomareva, Candidate of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences, Associate Professor, galy.ponomareva@mail.ru
V. P. Petrishchev, Head of Department, Doctor Geographical Sciences, Associate Professor

Abstract

The article describes the results of the determination of chemical elements in the waste at the Blyava opencast mining and dumping facility in the Southern Urals as a possible unconventional source of some metals, including non-ferrous metals. Research materials were samples taken from the western overburden dump. The concentration of elements was determined by the atomic emission method. The preliminary preparation of the samples included salting, acid etching and conversion of the obtained salts into chlorides. The instrumental analysis was performed on a Focused Photonics Inc ICP-5000 spectrometer. As a result of the conducted atomic emission analysis, the concentrations were determined for ferrous metals—Fe, Mn, Cr, V; non-ferrous metals (the basis of non-ferrous metallurgy)—Al, Mg, Ni, Co, Cu, Zn, Pb, Ca, Sr, Va, Na, K; rare metals—Rb, Cs; scattered metals of sulfide ores—Tl, Ga, Cd, Se, As. Furthermore, the concentrations of nonmetals—B, S, P—were also determined in the samples from the western dump of the Blyava copper–zinc deposit. The contents of elements in the samples from the western dump were compared with the average contents of these elements in basalt rocks according to K. Tarkyan and K. Vedepol, with the contents of the same elements in the Gayskoe deposit ore (eastern area) and in pyrite ores of the Urals. The comparative analysis shows that the content of many elements in the waste from the western dump is higher than the average contents of these elements in the main rocks. The results obtained for Cu, Zn, Mn and Ni in the waste from the western dump are consistent with the literature data on the average contents of these elements in the ores from the eastern zone of the Gayskoe deposit and in pyrite ores of the Urals as a whole. Thus, the western dump of the Blyava deposit is a possible source of non-ferrous and some rare metals, which requires a more detailed study of man-made dumps at copper–pyrite deposits in the Southern Urals. For another thing, due to exogenous processes, the mentioned these elements continue to enter the environment and pollute it.
The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, Grant No. 23-27-10006 “The Analysis of Manmade Geosystem Formation as a Result of Ore Mining in the Orenburg Region Toward Reclamation Management Improvement”.

keywords Unconventional resources, non-ferrous metals, Blyava deposit, Southern Urals
References

1. Dushin V. A., Makarov A. B. Unconventional Types of Mineral Deposits : Tutorial. Yekaterinburg : UGGU, 2015. 223 p.
2. Guman O. M., Makarov A. B., Grevtsev N. V., Vegner-Kozlova E. O. Features of engineering and environmental research for disturbed lands restoration in mining regions. Izvestiya vuzov. Gornyi zhurnal. 2020. No. 2. pp. 68–76.
3. Arbatov A. A., Astakhov A. S., Laverov N. P., Tolkachev M. V. Unconventional Mineral Resources. Series: Along the Avenue of Advanced Scientific and Technical Progress. Moscow : Nedra, 1988. 253 p.
4. Lyadskiy P. V., Kvasnyuk L. N., Zhdanov A. V. et al. State Geological Map of the Russian Federation. Scale 1:1 000 000 (third generation). Ural series. Sheet M–40 (Orenburg) with flapper М–41. Explanatory Note. Saint-Petersburg : Kartograficheskaya fabrika VSEGEI, 2013. 393 p.
5. Petrishchev V. P., Chibilev A. A. Ecological consequences of copper–pyrite ore mining in the steppe zone of the Southern Urals. Mineral Mining and Sustainable Development Strategy for Russia’s Regions in Terms of the Voronezh Region : Conference Proceedings. Voronezh : Elist, 2014. pp. 122–129.
6. Egorov I. V. (Ed.). Productivity of the Earth’s Bowels. Moscow : VIMS, 2019. 544 p.
7. Egorova I. V., Mikhaylov B. K. Objective method for analysis of mineral resources supply on the example of Russia. Rudy i metally. 2021. No. 4. pp. 6–21.
8. Buckley A. N., Hope G. A., Parker G. K., Steyn J., Woods R. Mechanism of mixed dithiophosphate and mercaptobenzothiazole collectors for Cu sulfide ore minerals. Minerals Engineering. 2017. Vol. 109. pp. 80–97.
9. Hu Y., Ye L., Li Z., Huang Z., Zhang J. Genesis of fahlore in the Tianbaoshan lead–zinc deposit, Sichuan Province, China: a scanning electron microscopy–energy dispersive spectroscopy study. Acta Geochimica. 2018. Vol. 37, Iss. 6. pp. 842–853.
10. Hamzayev V. Study of the environmental impact of the exploitation of rare elements. Proceedings of Azerbaijan High Technical Educational Institutions. 2024. Vol. 37(5), Iss. 2. pp. 353–360.
11. The Global Risks Report 2024: insight report. 19th ed. Cologny/Geneva : World Economic Forum, 2024. 124 р.
12. Davoise D., Méndez A. Research of an Abandoned Tailings Deposit in the Iberian Pyritic Belt: Characterization and Gross Reserves Estimation. Processes. 2023. Vol. 11, Iss. 6. ID 1642.
13. Yakovlev G. F. (Ed.). Paleozoic Volcanism and Pyrite Deposits of the Southern Urals. Moscow : Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1968. 291 p.
14. Prokin V. A., Necheukhin V. M., Sopko P. F., Seravkin I. B., Alekseev A. A. et al. Copper–pyrite deposits of Urals: Geological formation conditions. Sverdlovsk : UNTs AN SSSR, 1985. 288 p.
15. Pshenichnyi G. N. Gayskoe Copper–Pyrite Deposit in the Southern Urals. Moscow : Nauka, 1975. 187 p.
16. Prokin V. A., Buslaev F. P., Vinogradov A. M., Moloshag V. P., Kuznetsov S. I. Gaysky GOK : Geology of the Gayskoe and Podolskoe Copper–Zinc–Pyrite Deposits in the Urals. Yekaterinburg : IGG UrO RAN, 2004. 148 p.
17. Vikentev I. V., Moloshag V. P., Yudovskaya M. A. Speciation of noble metals and conditions of their concentration in massive sulfide ores of the Urals. Geology of Ore Deposits. 2006. Vol. 48, No. 2. pp. 77–107.
18. Prokin V. A., Seravkin I. B., Buslaev F. P., Snachev V. I., Puchkov V. N. et al. Copper–pyrite deposits of Urals: conditions of formation. Sverdlovsk : UrO RAN, 1992. 308 p.
19. Glazovskaya M. A. Geochemistry of natural and Manmade Landscapes in the USSR : Tutorial. Moscow : Vysshaya shkola, 1988. 328 p.
20. Emlin E. F. Technogenesis—The recent stage in geological history of ore deposits of the Urals. Izvestiya vuzov. Gornyi zhurnal. 1993. No. 1. pp. 43–126.
21. Avdonin V. V., Boytsov V. E., Grigorev V. M., Seminskiy Zh. V., Solodov N. A. et al. Metalliferous Mineral Deposits. 2nd enlarged and revised edition. Moscow : Akademicheskiy Proekt, Triksta, 2005. 720 p.
22. Ponomareva G. A. Noble Metals of the Gaysky Copper–Zinc Massive Sulphide Deposit of Orenburg Region. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Physical and Mathematical Modelling of Earth and Environmental Processes. Series: Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Cham : Springer, 2024. pp. 79–85.
23. Makarov A. B., Talalai A. G., Guman O. M., Khasanova G. G. Anthropogenic deposits and their impact on the natural environment. Izvestiya vuzov. Gornyi zhurnal. 2022. No. 3. pp. 120–129.
24. Kuksanov V. F., Groshev I. V., Grigoreva O. V. Geochemical features of ground in the Mednogorsk Geochemical Anomaly. Geoecology of the Southern Urals : The Second All-Russian Conference Proceedings. Orenburg : IPK GOU OGU, 2005. Vol. 1. pp. 205–209.
25. Udachin V. N., Aminov P. G., Lonshchakova G. F., Deryagin V. V. Distribution of physical and chemical parameters in quarry lakes of sulphide ore fields Blyavinskoye and Yaman-Kosinskoye (the Soth Urals). Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. No. 5(99). pp. 166–172.
26. Petrishchev V. P., Ponomareva G. A. Landscape and geochemical features of the technogeosystem of the Gai field. Ekologiya urbanizirovannykh territoriy. 2023. No. 4. pp. 6–9.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back