ArticleName |
The choice of optimal binder for molybdenite concentrate
granulation |
ArticleAuthorData |
Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of Academy of Sciences of Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan:
V. P. Guro, Head of Non-Ferrous Metals Laboratory, e-mail: vpguro@rambler.ru F. M. Yusupov, Head of Chemical Technology Laboratory E. T. Safarov, Senior Researcher of Non-Ferrous Metals Laboratory F. G. Rakhmatkarieva, Doctor's Degree Competitor of Element Analysis Laboratory |
Abstract |
Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Combine is the supplier of molybdenite concentrate in the form of calcined granules. Granulation charge includes 92–90% of Mo-concentrate and 8–10% of kaolin. Decreasing of kaolin content leads to decreasing of the pellet durability, while its increasing leads to the difficulty of the access of oxygen in granules. In both cases, sulfur content in marketable product grows. However, the optimal content of kaolin in charge leads to the expense of the technology: dilution of concentrate with kaolin and cinder dilution with molybdenum by 4–5%. Besides, kaolin in cinder content complicates the sublimate Re2O7, ammonium leaching of molybdenum and gold and silver extraction from its processing cake. This paper searches the pelletization scheme, minimizing this disad vantage. The approach is based on partial or complete replacement of kaolin by organic component of the charge, burning during the granule calcining. Polyacrylonitrile and cellulose glicollic acid production wastes were chosen as an organic component. During the choice of the binding, alternative to kaolin, the authors were guided by its functional applicability as a component of the charge, giving hydrophilic and mechanical pro perties. As a result of the researches, there was defined the necessary range of these indicators for various combinations of mineral-organic binders. There were found the charge compositions, providing the required exploitation and technological properties of marketable product. There were carried out the successful pilot tests of charge mixtures. The advantages of new compositions were defined: the charge impoverishment is decreased, and valuable components are easier extracted from molybdenite concentrate. The change of the charge composition does not lead to the changes of pelletizing technology and processing of granulated product. This work was carried out according to the State Grant 7-FK-0-19005 (7-ФK-0-19005). |
References |
1. TSh 64-23283880–07:2013. Ogarok promyshlennogo produkta molibdenovogo (TSh 64-23283880–07:2013. Industrial molybdenium product cinder). Tashkent : Uzstandart, 2013. (in Russian) 2. GOST 2677–78. Ammoniy molibdenovokislyy. Tekhnicheskie usloviya (State Standard 2677–78. Ammonium molybdate. Specifications). Introduced: January 01, 1980. (in Russian) 3. Ivanov N. S., Poddubnyy A. P., Poddubnyy A. A., Ivanova N. A., Zinoveva S. A. Sposob polucheniya okatyshey iz zhelezorudnykh kontsentratov (Method of pellet obtaining from iron-ore concentrates). Patent RF, No. 2034055, IPC6 C 22 B 1/243. Applied: June 08, 1992. Published: April 30, 1995. 4. Arapov G. I., Chernyaev V. F. Kompleksnoe svyazuyushchee dlya proizvodstva zhelezorudnykh okatyshey (Complex binder for iron-ore pellet manufacturing). Patent RF, No. 2227165, IPC6 C 22 B 1/242. Applier and patent-holder: JSC “AVA”. Applied: July 02, 2003. Published: April 20, 2004. 5. de Moraes S. L., de Lima J. R. B., Neto J. B. F. Influence of dispersants on the rheological and colloidal properties of iron ore, ultrafine particles and their effect on the pelletizing process — A review. The Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 2013. Vol. 2, No. 4. pp. 386–391. 6. Quaicoe I., Nosrati A., Addai J. Influence of binder composition on hematite-rich mixed minerals agglomeration behaviour and product properties. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2015. Vol. 97. pp. 45–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2015.02.021. 7. Boger D. V. Rheology and the minerals industry. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. 2000. Vol. 20, No 1. pp. 1–25. 8. Manna M., Sasmal S., Banerjee P. K., Sengupta D. K. Effect of mineral geology, mineral size and settling time on selective dispersion and separation process for recovering iron value from iron ultra fines. Powder Technology. 2011. Vol. 211, No. 1. pp. 60–64. 9. Vieira M. G. Efeitos da reologia de polpa e avaliaзгo de dispersantes como aditivos de moagem na remoagem de um concentrado de minйrio de ferro. Minas Gerais: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 2011. 151 p. 10. Schmitt J. Binder composition and process for agglomerating particulate material. Patent US, No. 6071325, IPC C 22 B 1/244. Assignee: Nobel A. Published: June 06, 2000. 11. Dilsky S., Tooge C. A. B., Arias Medina J. A., Bartalini N. M., Santos A. T., Da Silva W. C., Speck Cassola M., Medina J. Binder Composition For The Agglomeration Of Fine Minerals And Pelletizing Process. Patent WO, No. 2013010629, IPC C 22 B 1/244. Published: January 24, 2013. 12. Dingeman D. L., Skagerberg W. E. Modified native starch base binder for pelletizing mineral material. Patent US, No. 5306327, IPC C 22 B 1/244. Published: April 26, 1994. 13. Guro V. P., Yusupov F. M., Ibragimova M. A. Pelleting of Molybdenite Concentrate with Organic-Mineral Binder. AASCIT Communications. 2015. Vol. 2, No. 5. pp. 200–204. 14. Voyutskiy S. S. Kurs kolloidnoy khimii (Colloid chemistry course). Moscow : Khimiya, 1964. 576 p. 15. Sivrikaya O., Arol A. I. Pelletization of magnetite ore with colemanite added organic binders. Powder Technology. 2011. Vol. 210, No. 1. pp. 23–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2011.02.007. |