ArticleName |
Coal froth in an aluminium electrolyzer: the problems and proposed solutions |
ArticleAuthorData |
Institute of Non-Ferrous Metals and Materials Science, Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia:
N. V. Belousova, Head of a Chair of Non-ferrous Metals Metallurgy N. A. Sharypov, Senior Lecturer of a Chair of Automation of Production Processes in Metallurgy S. G. Shakhray, Assistant Professor of a Chair of Technosphere Safety of Mining and Metallurgical Production, e-mail: shahrai56@mail.ru A. I. Bezrukikh, Assistant Professor |
Abstract |
The article is devoted to an important topic in the current aluminium industry — the reduction of the amount of dust formed during electrolysis. In a short literature review of foreign works on the problem of reducing the anode consumption, the sources of formation of dust in an aluminium reduction cell and its negative effect on the electrolysis process parameters are analysed: increasing the electrolyte resistance, increasing the electrolyte’s temperature and the loss of fluoride by evaporation, the risk of formation of anode spikes. Spikes can provoke short circuit of the anode and cathode and thus reduce the current efficiency, cause deterioration of alumina solubility in the electrolyte and the risk of formation of sludge at the bottom of the cell. Several options were considered as regards measures for reducing carbon consumption and dust release, including the use of special additives, introduced into the anode paste during production of anodes: Al2O3, Na2CO3 and ZnS. The results of the study on how these additives change the reactivity of anodes are presented. Some methods for improving the quality of the produced anode blocks by increasing the degree of impregnation of coke by pitch during anode production are presented; they are realized by means of imparting multi-polar electric charges of coke dust and pitch; reducing the degree of oxidation of the side surface of the anode, achieved with the use of a new anode configuration with a slot on the side surface, and also by increasing the stability of the upper surface of the anode to oxidation by air due to a change in the loading algorithm for the covering material. This paper was written within the project 02.G25.31.0181 “Development of a super-power energy efficient technology for aluminium RA-550 (РА-550) obtaining” according to the program of realization of complex projects for creation of high-technological production, approved by the governmental order of Russian Federation No. 218 (9 April 2010). |
References |
1. Rolofs B., Wai-Poi N. The Effect of Anode Spike Formation on Operational Performance. Light Metals. 2000. pp. 189–193. 2. Sadler B., Welch B. Reducing Carbon Dust? — Needs And Possible Directions. 9th Australasian Aluminium Smelting Technology Conference and Workshops, Terrigal, Australia. 2007. pp. 1–14. 3. Perruchoud R. C., Hulse K. L., Fischer W. K.,Schmidt-Hatting W. Dust Generation And Accumulation For Changing Anode Quality And Cell Parameters. Light Metals. 1999. DOI: 10.1002/9781118647745.ch85. 4. Foosnas T., Naterstad T., Bruheim M., Grjotheim K. Anode dusting in hall-heroult cells. Light Metals. 1986. pp. 633–642. 5. Levich V. G. Physical and chemical hydrodynamics. Moscow : Fizmatgiz, 1959. 700 p. 6. Burnakin V. V. Hydro and gas dynamics and mass-exchange in aluminium and magnesium electrometallurgy : Dissertation … of Doctor of Engineering Sciences. 05.16.03. Krasnoyarsk, 1990. 330 p. 7. Grjotheim K., Welch B. J. Aluminium Smelter Technology. Düsseldorf : Aluminium-Verlag, 1988. 327 p. 8. Gudmundsson H. Anode dusting from a potroom perspective at Nordural and correlation with anode properties. Light Metals. 2011. pp. 657–662. 9. Welch B. J. Technical issues of provision of high productivity of aluminium electrolysers. Collection of reports of the X International Conference “Aluminium of Siberia – 2004”. pp. 17–25. 10. Bugnion L., Fischer J. C. Carbon dust in electrolysis pots – effect on the electrical resistivity of cryolite bath. International Aluminium Journal. 2016. Vol. 92, No. 1/2. pp. 44–47. 11. Meier M., Perruchoud R. Influence of anode performance on smelter cost. Proceedings of the VII International Congress “Non-Ferrous Metals and Minerals” – Krasnoyarsk, 2015. pp. 460–477. 12. Ali M. M., Omran A. M. Anode spike formation in prebaked aluminium reduction cells. Al-Azhar University Engineering Journal, JAUES. December 2012. Vol. 7, No. 4. pp. 29–41. 13. Műftűoģlu T. and Oye H.A. Reactivity and electrolytic consumption of anode carbon witch various addivites. Light Metals. 1987. pp. 667–672. 14. Fischer W. F., Perruchoud R. Factors Influencing the Carboxy- and Air-Reactivity Behaviour of Prebaked Anodes in Hall-Heroult Cells. Light Metals. 1986. pp. 575–580. 15. Lapaev I. I., Shakhray S. G., Sharypov N. A. Method of anode mass production. Patent RF, No. 2464360. Published: 20.10.2012. Bulletin No. 29. 16. Shakhray S. G., Sharypov N. A., Belyanin A. V. Increase of coke impregnation efficiency by pitch at production of anode paste for aluminum cells. Metallurg. 2014. No. 11. pp. 115–117. 17. Wilkening S. Reflections on the Carbon Consumption of Prebaked Anodes. Essential Readings in Light Metals: Electrode Technology for Aluminum Production. 2013. pp. 623–632. 18. Shakhray S. G., Polyakov P. V., Mikhalev Yu. G. Method of protection of baked anode of aluminium electrolyzer. Patent for invention No. 2015148448. 10.11.2015. Patent decision: 20.01.2017. 19. Shakhray S. G., Polyakov P. V., Skuratov A. P. Method of anode massif covering. Patent RF, No. 2586184. Published: 10.06.2016. Bulletin No. 16. |