Journals →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2018 →  #11 →  Back

MINING
ArticleName Effect of mine-technical factors on the choice of overdrill value in blasting
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2018.11.16
ArticleAuthor Borychev V. M., Ilyakhin S. V., Bryukhovetsky O. S.
ArticleAuthorData

Sergo Ordzhonikidze Russian State Geological Prospecting University, Moscow, Russia:

V. M. Borychev, Senior Researcher, Candidate of Engineering Sciences
S. V. Ilyakhin, Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, isv11@mail.ru
O. S. Bryukhovetsky, Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences

Abstract

One of the main parameters of drilling and blasting is the value of overdrill. This value is usually 10–20 % of the total blast hole length, while the volume of the explosive in the overdrill can reach 50 % of the whole charge. Therefore, significant parts of the hole and charge are beyond the effective blasting zone in a bench. The choice of the optimal overdrill value will allow reduction in volume of drilling, rational placement of charge along the bench height and elimination of excessive destruction of the lower lying bench top. The analysis of the overdrill formulas known from literature shows that it impossible to compare these formulas due to different views of some influencing factors. For this reason, the formulas produce approximate results mostly, and the scatter of calculated data may reach 64 %. Thus, it is necessary to find a relation that takes into account the whole set of all basic influencing factors. As a result of theoretical processing of the existing formulas for determining the value of overdrill, the main dependence between the mine-technical conditions, drilling-and-blasting design and overdrill size has been obtained. The scope of the analysis embraces the effect of bench height hole diameter, rock hardness, charge placement conditions in hole and other factors. For this purpose, factual data were collected from 63 mines with various geotechnical conditions. There were 8 groups of rock hardness, and blast holes were group with respect to diameter: 105–115 mm; 145–165 mm and 250 mm. As a result of the performed analysis, the overdrill value formula has been finalized. The variation factor for the actual and calculated values is 21 %.

keywords Mining-technical factors, method of calculation, parameters of blasting, brute force, explosive charge, multivariate analysis
References

1. USSR Code VSN 281–71/MMSS. Technical Regulations for Blasting on Ground Surface. 5th enlarged and revised edition. Moscow : Nedra, 1972. 238 p.
2. Technical Regulations for Blasting in Construction in Energy Engineering. Moscow : Energiya, 1972. 208 p.
3. Afonin V. G., Geiman L. M., Komir V. M. Reference Book on Blasting in Construction. 2nd enlarged and revised edition. Kiev : Budivelnik, 1982. 176 p.
4. Melnikov N. V. Brief Reference Book on Blasting. 4th edition. Moscow : Nedra, 1982. 413 p.
5. Avdeev F. A., Baron V. L., Gurov N. V., Kantor V. Kh. Reference Book on Standards in Drilling-and-Blasting. 5th enlarged and revised edition. Moscow : Nedra, 1986. 511 p.
6. Baron V. L., Kantor V. Kh. Blasting Technology and Equipment in USA. Moscow : Nedra, 1989. 376 p.
7. Trubetskoy K. N., Victorov S. D., Zakalinsky V. M., Osokin A. A. Large-scale explosive destruction of rock masses: Current state and potential applications. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2016. No. 10. pp. 64–69. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2016.10.13
8. Singh S. P., Abdul H. Investigation of blast design parameters to optimize fragmentation. Rock Fragmentation by Blasting (Fragblast 10): Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 2013. pp. 181–187.
9. Akande J. M., Lawal A. I. Optimization of Blasting Parameters Using Regression Models in Ratcon and NSCE Granite Quarries, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Geomaterials. 2013. Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 28–37.
10. Furtney J. K., Sellers E., Onederra I. Simple models for the complex process of rock blasting. Rock Fragmentation by Blasting (Fragblast 10): Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium. Boca Raton : CRC Press, 2013. pp. 275–282.
11. Singh P. K., Roy M. P., Amalendu Sinha. Controlled Blasting for Safe and Efficient Mining Operations at Rampura Agucha Mine in India. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Physical Problems of Rock Destruction. China, 2014. pp. 137–151.
12. Duan Y., Xiong D., Yao L., Wang F., Xu G. Advanced Technology for Satting Out of Blastholes and Measurement while Drilling. Rock Fragmentation by Blasting (Fragblast 11): Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium. Sydney, 2015. pp. 593–598.
13. Fadeev A. B. Blast effect of elongated charges along bench toe. Vzryvnoe delo. 1964. No. 54/11.
14. Safety Regulations for Blasting. Series: Federal Norms and Rules in Industrial Safety. Novosibirsk : Normatika, 2016. 172 p.
15. Kutuzov B. N. Methods of Blasting : Textbook. 3rd edition. Moscow : Gornaya kniga, 2018. Part I: Rock Blasting. 476 p.
16. Shepelina P. V. Efficient Blasting Conditions in Hard Rocks : Tutorial. Moscow : Altair-MGAVT, 2016. 80 p.
17. Ugolnikov N. V. Blasting Quality Control : Educational Aid. Magnitogorsk : Nosov MGTU, 2016. 156 p.
18. Bryukhovetsky O. S., Ilyakhin S. V., Karpikov A. P., Yashin V. P. Principles of Mining : Educational Aid. Saint-Petersburg : Lan, 2017. 352 p.

Full content Effect of mine-technical factors on the choice of overdrill value in blasting
Back