Journals →  Tsvetnye Metally →  2018 →  #12 →  Back

BENEFICATION
ArticleName Use of magnetic techniques for lead concentrate upgrading
DOI 10.17580/tsm.2018.12.03
ArticleAuthor Plotnikova A. A., Bragin V. I.
ArticleAuthorData

Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia:

A. A. Plotnikova, Postgraduate Student, e-mail: alena_plotnikova_0909@inbox.ru
V. I. Bragin, Head of Mineral Beneficiation Department

Abstract

The biggest problem for obtaining commercial concentrates from lead-zinc ores is primarily related to the composition of such ores, as well as the nature of associations formed by valuable minerals with one another and with the gangue minerals. Better beneficiation indicators for lead-zinc ores could be achieved through the use of processes that combine several beneficiation techniques, which are related to different physical properties of minerals. To understand the composition of sphalerite contained in the Gorevsk deposit ores, the authors analysed the composition of zinc concentrate produced by the concentration plant. The authors also looked at possible causes of the high magnetic susceptibility in sphalerite. It was established that in zinc concentrate, sphalerite is mainly associated with galenite, and to a lesser degree — with pyrite, pyrrhotite, quartz and siderite. Sphalerite is rich in iron, the average concentration of iron in it is 6.63 wt.%. That’s why sphalerite accounts for more than 64% of all the iron contained in the concentrate. The authors also looked at the possibility to use high-gradient magnetic separation to enhance the quality of the flotation lead concentrate and reduce zinc losses. During high-gradient magnetic separation, iron-containing sphalerite, as well as unbonded grains of pyrrhotite and siderite, transfer to the magnetic product, while galenite remains in the non-magnetic part. The authors found that the introduction of high-gradient magnetic separation with the magnetic force of 880 kA/m as a recleaner stage for the lead concentrate of the Gorevsk deposit helps increase the lead concentration in the recleaner lead concentrate by 23.04% and, at the same time, reduce the concentration of zinc from 4.91 to 1.5%. The recovery of lead can reach 73.41%. The magnetic recovery of zinc can reach 84.07%, with the concentration of 8.6%.

keywords Lead-zinc ores, phase composition, micro X-ray spectral analysis, high-gradient magnetic separation, concentrate, concentration, recovery
References

1. Kontar E. S. Lead and zinc deposits in the history of Earth’s crust. Litosfera. 2016. No. 3. pp. 5–26.
2. Precious and base metals overview. Trends and facts for silver, gold, zinc and lead Sotkamo Silver. Metals International. 2014. Available at: http://www.silver.fi/tiedostot/reports/Technical%20reports/140303_Metals_International_Precious_and_base_metals_overview_LARGE.pdf (Accessed: 01.11.2018).
3. Kushakova L. B., Shumskiy V. A., Brailko O. Yu. Possibility of extraction of secondary constituents during non-ferrous metal ore processing. Tsvetnye Metally. 2016. No. 9. pp. 28–34.
4. Chervony I. F., Bredikhin V. N., Gritsay V. P. Non-ferrous metallurgy of Ukraine. Vol. 1. P. 1. Metals and their classification, beneficiation of nonferrous metal ores, light non-ferrous metals. Zaporozhie : ZGIA, 2014. 380 p.
5. Algebraistova N. K., Markova A. S., Prokopiev I. V., Razvyaznaya A. V. On preparation of bulk concentrates for the selection cycle. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten. 2016. No. 1. pp. 187–194.
6. Jacek Kolacz. Advanced separation technologies for pre-concentration of metal ores and the additional process control. Mineral Engineering Conference. 2017. Vol. 18. pp. 1–4.
7. Siging Liu, Xiujuan Li, Yang Zhao, Tingting Li. Benefication of a low grate lead ore by gravity pre-concentration and flotation. Applied Mechanism and Materials. 2013. Vol. 387. pp. 11–14.
8. Abramov A. A. Processing and beneficiation of non-ferrous metal ores: Guide for university students. Book 2. Moscow : Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo gornogo universiteta, 2005. 470 p.
9. Abramov A. A. Beneficiation through flotation: Learner’s guide. Moscow : Gornaya kniga, 2008. 710 p.
10. Chanturiya V. A., Kozlov A. P. Integrated processing of complex ores and manmade materials: Current problems. Plaksin readings – 2017: Proceedings of the International Science Conference, Krasnoyarsk, 12–15 September 2017. Krasnoyarsk : Sibirsky federalny universitet, 2017. pp. 3–6.
11. Semushkina L. V., Turysbekov D. K., Bekturganov N. S., Мukhanova А. А. The Shalkiya deposit finely disseminated lead-zinc ore processing technology improvement. Obogashchenie Rud. 2015. No. 2. pp. 8–14. DOI: 10.17580/or.2015.02.02
12. Betekhtin A. G. A course in Mineralogy: Learner’s guide. Moscow : KDU, 2007. 736 p.
13. Cao L., Huang S., Shulin E. ZnS/CdS/ZnS quantum dot quantum well produced in inverted micelles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2004. Vol. 273. pp. 478–482.
14. Sue Marcus. Mineral of the month sphalerite. The Mineral Newsletter. 2017. Vol. 58, No. 7. pp. 2–4.
15. Cook N. J., Ciobanu C. L., Pring A., Skinner W., Shimizu M., Danyushevsky L., Saini-Eidukat B., Melcher F. Trace and minor elements in sphalerite: a LA-ICPMS study. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2009. Vol. 73. pp. 4761–4791.
16. Pattrick R. A. D., Mosselmans J. F. W., Charnock J. M. An X-ray absorption study of doped sphalerites. European Journal of Mineralogy. 1998. No. 10. pp. 239–249.
17. Di Benedetto F., Andreozzi G. B., Bernardini G. P., Borgheresi M., Caneschi A., Cipriani C., Gatteschi D., Romanelli M. Short-range order of Fe2+ in sphalerite by 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy and magnetic susceptibility. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals. 2005. Vol. 32. Iss. 5. pp. 339–348.
18. Gulyaeva R. I., Selivanov E. N., Dorogina G. A., Uporov S. A., Pryanichnikov S. V. Structure and physical properties of natural sphalerites and galena from the Dal’negorsk deposit in the temperature range 4–300. Russian Geology and Geophysics. 2017. Vol. 58. No. 8. pp. 990–999.
19. Wright K., Gale J. D. A first principles study of the distribution of iron in sphalerite. Geohimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2010. Vol. 74. pp. 3514–3520.
20. Chen Jian-hua, Chen Ye, Li Yu-qiong. Effect of vacancy defects on electronic properties and activation of sphalerite surface by first-principles. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China. 2010. Vol. 20. pp. 502–506.
21. Pearce C. I., Pattrick R. A. D., Vaughan D. J. Electrical and Magnetic Properties of Sulfides. Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry. 2006. Vol. 61. pp. 127–180.
22. Sloboda J. Magnetic Techniques for the Treatment of Materials. USA : Springer Science, 2004. 576 p.
23. Glumova A. A., Bragin V. I. Improving the quality of lead concentrate by recleaning in a high-gradient magnetic separator: Proceedings of the 15th international conference “Natural and intellectual resources of Siberia. Sibresurs 2014”. Kemerovo, KuzGTU, 2014. p. 85.
24. Jirestig J., Forssberg E. Magnetic characterization examples from Sweden. Magnetic and Electrical Separation. 1992. Vol. 4. pp. 31–45.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back