Journals →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2019 →  #8 →  Back

INDUSTRY SAFETY AND LABOUR PROTECTION
ArticleName Expert system based on fuzzy logic for assessment of methane and dust explosion risk in coal mines
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2019.08.17
ArticleAuthor Kabanov E. I., Korshunov G. I., Rodionov V. A.
ArticleAuthorData

Saint-Petersburg Mining University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia:

E. I. Kabanov, Associate Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, kabanov_ei@pers.spmi.ru
G. I. Korshunov, Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences
V. A. Rodionov, Associate Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the creation of methane and dust explosion risk assessment method for coal mines for implementation of the risk-oriented approach to supervisory activities and also for solving the information support problems in managerial decisions making procedures, which aims to reducing the probability of methane and dust explosions in underground workings of coal mines. The premises for transition to the dynamic model of the risk-oriented approach are indicated. The information about dynamics of fatal injuries coefficient for underground coal mining for the last 10 years is provided. The model of expert system, based on fuzzy logic, is proposed. The model is designed for risk assessment in condition of information uncertainty in case of incompleteness or lack of reliable data about the impact of risk factors on the mine safety level. On the basis of the investigation of accidents materials in Russia in 2006-2017, the structural scheme of the expert system was created. Input parameters of the model and results of expert assessment of risk factors are described. The fuzzy logic inference knowledge base was created with using of the MATLAB Fuzzy Logic Toolbox computing environment for taking into account the influence of the complex of geological, technical and subjective factors on the risk of methane and dust explosions. The developed model allows ranking the coal mine sites according to the explosions risk levels, which was proved by processing of the initial data sample. The developed model can be integrated into multifunctional safety systems to assess the risk of various type accidents in real time.

keywords Coal mine, accident, methane and dust explosions, risk assessment, risk-oriented approach, expert system, fuzzy logic inference system
References

1. Rudakov M. L. «Zero accident» corporate programmes as an element of strategic planning in the field of occupational safety and health at coal mining enterprises. Zapiski Gornogo instituta. 2016. Vol. 219. pp. 465–471.
2. Rykov A. M., Li Hi Un, Filatov Yu. M. Risk-directed approach in coal mines safety provision. Vestnik Nauchnogo tsentra po bezopasnosti rabot v ugolnoy promyshlennosti. 2016. No. 1. pp. 73–76.
3. Safety Manual: Recommended procedures for hazard analysis and accident risk assessment at hazardous production objects. Iss. 16. Series 27. Industrial safety avowal and risk assessment. Moscow : NTTs PB, 2017. 56 p.
4. Zinovyeva E. G., Koptyakova S. V. Assessment of integration risks for metallurgical enterprises using the fuzzy set method. CIS Iron and Steel Review. 2019. Vol. 17. pp. 58–64. DOI: 10.17580/cisisr.2019.01.11
5. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/420372694 (accessed: 15.06.2019).
6. Puchkov L. A., Temkin I. O. Generating data bases for aero-gas-dynamics monitoring and control in coal mines. GIAB. 1995. No. 5. pp. 3–8.
7. Temkin I. O. Principles of construction of intelligent control systems for mining processes. GIAB. 1996. No. 3. pp. 81–86.
8. Javadi M., Saeedi G., Shahriar K. Fuzzy Bayesian Network Model for Roof Fall Risk Analysis in Underground Coal Mines. Journal of Applied Sciences. 2017. Vol. 17. pp. 103–115.
9. Abdolreza Yazdani-Chamzini. Proposing a new methodology based on fuzzy logic for tunnelling risk assessment. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 2014. Vol. 20, Iss. 1. pp. 82–94.
10. Markowski A. S., Mannan M. S., Kotynia A., Pawlak H. Application of fuzzy logic to explosion risk assessment. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2011. Vol. 24, Iss. 6. pp. 780–790.
11. Domrachev A. N., Paleev D. Yu., Govorukhin Yu. M., Krivolapov V. G., Lipatin V. I. The using of neural networks and fuzzy logic methods in estimating methan explosion possibility. Vestnik Nauchnogo tsentra po bezopasnosti rabot v ugolnoy promyshlennosti. 2014. No. 1. pp. 40–43.
12. Ushakov V. K., Balovtsev S. V. Estimate of cause-and-effect for factors of aerological risk in coal mines. GIAB. 2011. Special Issue 7. Aerology, methane, safety. pp. 363–366.
13. Kumar R., Ghosh A. K. Mines Systems Safety Improvement Using an Integrated Event Tree and Fault Tree Analysis. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D. 2017. Vol. 98, Iss. 1. pp. 101–108.
14. Nian Qifeng, Shi Shiliang, Runqiu L. I. Research and application of safety assessment method of gas explosion accident in coal mine based on GRA-ANP-FCE. Procedia Engineering. 2012. Vol. 45. pp. 106–111.
15. Nemchinov D. V. Estimation of risk of failures with use of expert systems. Vestnik Astrakhanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2007. No. 1(36). pp. 40–45.
16. Korshunov G. I., Rudakov M. L., Kabanov E. I. The Use of a Risk-Based Approach in Safety Issues of Coal Mines. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism. 2018. Vol. IX, Iss. 1(25). pp. 181–186.
17. Korshunov G. I., Kazanin O. I., Rudakov M. L., Nedosekin A. O., Kabanov E. I. Development of methodology for assessment of accident risk for coal mines with taking into account the specific geological conditions. GIAB. 2017. Special Issue 5-1. Industrial safety of enterprises of mineralresource complex in the XXI century-1. pp. 374–382.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back