Journals →  Eurasian mining →  2020 →  #1 →  Back

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
ArticleName Dialectical contradictions and resolutions toward innovative development and ecological safety enhancement in modern-day coal mining
DOI 10.17580/em.2020.01.16
ArticleAuthor Prokopenko S. A., Lesin Yu. V., Li A. A., Shadrin V. G.
ArticleAuthorData

Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia1 ; VostNII Science Center, Kemerovo, Russia2:

Prokopenko S. A.1,2, Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, sibgp@mail.ru

 

VostNII Science Center, Kemerovo, Russia:

Li A. A., Academic Secretary, Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences

 

Gorbachev Kuzbass State Technical University, Kemerovo, Russia:

Lesin Yu. V., Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences

 

Kemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russia:
Shadrin V. G., Associate Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences

Abstract

The incremental coal production raises ecological tension in the coal mining areas. Environmental measures only allow minor mitigation of the impact. This study aims to disclose the deep causes of the adverse condition of the coal mining regions and to find innovative resources for the improvement of the ecological situation. The analysis and understanding of understanding between a human being and the crust in the course of solid mineral mining has revealed dialectical contradictions in activities of mines. The hierarchical arrangement and scrutiny of the contradictions show that mines poorly use resource potential of mineral deposits due to technological and economic underdevelopment of mining areas. Not many georesources available within the limits of a mining lease are converted into economically valuable products. Some matter of the lithosphere finds utilization after additional processing, while the major portion of georesources falls in the category of waste. The currently available technologies of re-processing only partly solve the problem by converting some waste into profit-yielding products. The situation in existence in mineral mining to be modified calls for the resolution of the dialectical contradictions and for the breakthrough innovations. One of the latter may be the change in the operational policy of a mine with replacement of coal flow by the flow of energy fluids. This will release a mining area from the whole range of adverse ecological and economic impacts. The change of the operational policies of coal mines is the top-priority objective of mining engineers, as well as scientists and practitioners in mining, and presses for the build-up of their intelligent and innovative potential. Such advancement is possible through resolution of other dialectical contradictions the essence of which is planned to be disclosed in the framework of the further research.

The article is prepared in the framework of the Competitive Power Improvement Program of the National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University.

keywords Сoal mine, ecology, georesource, dialectical contradictions, resolution, mining engineers, innovation, potential, technology, product, waste, dump, commodity
References

1. Nifantov B.F. Coals with lucrative contents of chemical elements for the industrial extraction. GIAB. 2013. No. S6. pp. 111–121.
2. Trubetskoy K. N., Kaplunov D. R., Rylnikova M.V. Principles and methodological basis for the formation of a new technological system of sustainable development of underground ore mines in Russia. Fundamententalnye i prikladnye voprosy gornykh nauk. 2018. Vol. 5. No. 1. pp. 127–134.
3. Trubetskoy K. N., Galchenko Yu. Nature-Friendly Mining Technologies as a Condition of the Global Contradictions in the Development of Mineral Resources of the Lithosphere Resolution. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2017. Vol. 87. No. 7. pp. 655–662.
4. Makarishina Yu. I. Enhancement of ecological safety of overburden dumps at coal mines in Donbass using physical methods and revegetation : thesis of inauguration of Dissertation … of Candidate of Agricultural Sciences. Lugansk, 2016. 145 p.
5. Ilkovskiy K. K., Timofeev D. I. View into the future power engineering. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2011. No. 12. pp. 73–74.
6. Rylnikova M. V. Man-made renewable sources of energy in subsoil development. Energiya: economica, tekhnika, ecologiya. 2016. No. 12. pp. 10–16.
7. Buravchuk N. I., Gurjanova O. V., Ajrapetjan M. A. Experience of Utilization of Breeds of Mine Spoils for the Device of a Roadbed. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Severo-Kavkazskiy region. Tekhnicheskie nauki. 2007. Vol. 6. pp. 100–103.
8. Chumachenko N. G., Tyurnikov V. V., Petrova E. V., Khayrullova D. V. Carbonate rock waste—a promising source of wade range constructional materials. Molodoy uchenyi. 2016. No. 10-6. pp. 143–146.
9. Schopenhauer A. The world as will and representation. Dover Publications, 2012.
10. Mikhalchenko V. V., Prokopenko S. A., Orlov V. G. Land-saving technology for thick steeply dipping and sloping coal seam mining. Ugol. 1991. No. 5. pp. 44–46.
11. Kovalenko V. S. Increase in efficiency of natural and manmade resources use in open coal mining within the framework of the concept of "green" mining industry. Ugol. 2018. No. 4. pp. 60–63.
12. Prokopenko S. A. From underground coal mining – to the coal power complexes. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2005. No. 11. pp. 8–10.
13. Rzhevsky V. V. Underground combustion of coal : teaching aid. Moscow : Moskovskiy gornyy institut, 1990. 84 p.
14. Kreinin E. V. Nonconventional thermal technologies of hard-torecover fuels : coal, hydrocarbons. Moscow : IRTS Gazprom, 2004. 302 p.
15. Prokopenko S., Sushko A., Filatov Yu., Kislyakov M., Kislyakov I. Environmental improvement of opencast mining. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2017. Vol. 50. 012012. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/50/1/012012.
16. Popov A. N., Lesin Yu. V. Using of artificial filter massifs for purification of open pit mine Shestaki waste water. GIAB. 2015. No. S1-1. pp. 560–568.
17. Lesin Yu. V., Luk’yanova S. Y., Tyulenev M. A. Formation of the Composition and Properties of Dumps at the Open-Pit Mines of Kuzbass. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2015. Vol. 6. 012093.
18. Chekmenev Yu. V., Fursa A. N., Chekmenev A. Yu. Mine methane application. Ugol. 2016. No. 5. pp. 78–81.
19. Taylakov O. V., Zastrelov D. N., Smyslov A. I., Utkayev E. A. Coal mine methane recycling in power plants at coal mines. GIAB. 2013. No. S6. pp. 170–176.
20. Ruban A. D., Zaburdyaev V. S., Artemev V. B., Loginov A. K., Yutyaev E. P. Technological Processes of Methane Recovery and Utilization at Mine Named by S. M. Kirov. Tekhnologii nefti i gaza. 2011. No. 3(74). pp. 46–51.
21. Noskov O. The process starts! Ugol Kuzbassa. 2016. No. 3 (050). pp. 84–86.

Full content Dialectical contradictions and resolutions toward innovative development and ecological safety enhancement in modern-day coal mining
Back