Saint Petersburg Mining University, Saint Petersburg, Russia:

V. V. Lvov, Associate Professor at the Minerals Processing Department, Candidate of Technical Sciences, e-mail: lvov_vv@pers.spmi.ru
L. S. Chitalov, Postgraduate Student at the Minerals Processing Department

When designing new concentrator plants or revamping the existing ones, it is crucial to properly size and design the process equipment and choose the supplier. The comminution circuit is the most power consuming of all the processing stages. A variety of tests are usually performed to determine the physical and mechanical properties of ore, and the results of such tests serve as the basis for comminution circuit equipment sizing. Various computer simulation packages are used to find the best solutions in terms of process equipment and processes. Analysis of the in-house and public databases containing the test data helped obtain new relationships with regard to ore hardness. Having analyzed the public laboratory test data accumulated by Alex Doll, as well as the results of experiments conducted by the ore comminution laboratory of the Minerals Processing Department at Saint-Petersburg Mining University, the authors came up with a modern procedure to examine the physical and mechanical properties of ores for equipment sizing to implement a standard cycle of semi-autogenous grinding with further ball milling. Samples of copper-nickel ores were analyzed in this research study. The results of the analysis served as the basis to estimate the power consumption by the comminution circuit. The resultant figures were compared with the power consumption figures of a functioning concentrator plant that processes the studied copper-nickel ores. The estimated specific power consumption of the SAG mill deviated from the actual power consumption by –6.5%. In the case of the ball mills, the deviation was estimated at +14.4%. The total estimated specific power consumption of the entire comminution circuit exceeded the one of the functioning plant by +7.6%. The described approach is applicable to different comminution circuits, which include crushers, high pressure grinding roll, and tumbling mills. The resultant process parameters are necessary and sufficient for the comminution circuit simulation using the JKSimMet software and for crushing circuit simulation using the discrete element method in the RockyDEM software.
This research study was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant No. 20-55-12002 NNIO_a).

1. Nikolaeva N., Aleksandrova T., Romashev A. Effect of grinding on the fractional composition of polymineral laminated bituminous shales. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review. 2018. Vol. 39, Iss. 4. pp. 231–234.
2. Nikolaeva N., Romashev A., Aleksandrova T. Degree evaluation of grinding on fractional composition at destruction of polymineral raw materials. IMPC 2018 — 29^th International Mineral Processing Congress. 2019. pp. 474–480.
3. Talovina I. V., Aleksandrova T. N., Popov O., Lieberwirth H. Comparative analysis of rocks structural-textural characteristics studies by computer X-ray microtomography and quantitative microstructural analysis methods. Obogashchenie Rud. 2017. No. 3. pp. 56–62. DOI: 10.17580/or.2017.03.09.
4. Goryunov A. V., Ivanov A. N., Tikhonov N. O. The autogenous and semiautogenous grinding circuit at Erdenet: Current and prospective performance. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2016. No. 11. pp. 4–13. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2016.11.01.
5. Bond F. C. Crushing and grinding calculations. Reprinted from British Chemical Engineering. 1961. Parts I and II, with additions and revisions. 1962. Apri. Allis-Chalmers Publication No. 07R9235D.
6. McIvor R. E. Determining the Bond Efficiency of industrial grinding circuits. Global Mining Guidelines Group. 2015. v1-r04. pp. 1–15.
7. Akkerman Yu. E. Determining ore grindability for industrial grinding mill capacity calculations. Obogashchenie Rud. 2004. No. 5. pp. 35–42.
8. Daniel M. Morrell method for determining comminution circuit specific energy and assessing energy utilization efficiency of existing circuits. Global Mining Guidelines Group. 2016. v1-r04. pp. 1–17.
9. Morrell S. An alternative energy-size relationship that proposed by Bond for the design and optimization of grinding circuits. International Journal of Mineral Processing. 2004. Vol. 74. pp. 133–141.
10. Starkey J. H., Hindstrom S., Nadasdy G. N. SAG Design Testing – What It Is and Why It Works. International AG and SAG Grinding Technology. 2006. Vol. IV. pp. 240–254.
11. Andreev E. E., Tikhonov O. N. Ore crushing, grinding and preparation: Textbook. Saint Petersburg : Sankt-Peterburgskiy gosudarstvennyi gornyi institut (tekhnicheskiy universitet), 2007. pp. 225–230.
12. Lvov V. V., Sishchuk J., Chitalov L. S. Intensification of Bond ball mill work index test through various methods. 17^th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geo Conference SGEM. 2017. Vol. 17, Iss. 11. pp. 857–864. DOI: 10.5593/sgem2017/11/S04.109.
13. Matei V., Bailey C. W., Morrell S. A new way of representing A and b parameters from JKDrop-Weight and SMC tests: the “SCSE”. SAG Conference, Vancouver. 2015. pp. 1–12.
14. Doll A. A public Database of tumbling mill grindability measurements and their relationships. Materials of 12^th International Mineral Processing Conference. Procemin. 2016. pp. 1–24.
15. Taranov V. A., Baranov V. F., Aleksandrova T. N. Review of software tools for modeling and calculation of ore preparation flowsheets. Obogashchenie Rud. 2013. No. 5. pp. 3–7.
16. Comminution Specific Energy – SMC Testing. Available at: https://www.SMC Testing.com/tools/comminution-specific-energy (Accessed: 10.07.2020).
17. Gross Power Calculator – SMC Testing. Available at: https://www.SMCTesting.com/tools/gross-power (Accessed: 10.07.2020).
18. Lynch A. Comminution handbook. Australia : The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2015. pp. 197–200.