Chinakal Institute of Mining, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia:

S. A. Neverov, Head of Laboratory, Doctor of Engineering Sciences
Yu. N. Shaposhnik, Leading Researcher, Doctor of Engineering Sciences
A. A. Neverov, Leading Researcher, Doctor of Engineering Sciences
A. I. Konurin, Senior Researcher, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, akonurin@yandex.ru

This research aims to develop a methodology of selecting and validating support system designs for different purpose roadways by means of synthesizing the rock mass quality index Q and the stability categories which are in application in mines in Russia. The existing approaches to rock mass quality evaluation based on different combinations of complementary classification criteria are reviewed and generalized. It is found that the stability categories in use in Russian mines comply with the Q-index, which enables their flexible adaptation to specific features of a deposit and allows revealing of average mining conditions for different mines. The multi-factor rock mass quality rating and classification made it possible to justify mine designs per different categories. On this basis, the safe shapes and cross-section sizes are determined for the face entries for the prevalent geological conditions of ore mining under equicomponent (hydrostatic) stress state. The analysis and generalization of actual data from operating mines in the ore provinces in Yakutia, Russian Far East, Krasnoyarsk Krai and Eastern Kazakhstan allowed correlating the maximum permissible widths and cross-section shapes of roadways, as well as the roadway purpose and the rock mass quality by the Q-system by Barton. The revealed patterns of rock mass stability effect on the roadway roof span size made it possible to define rockbolting design variables for the face entries of operating mines in rock masses characterized by the widely ranging Q-index. The implementation of the integrated approach to rock mass stability estimation can improve reliability of the pre-project and project design solutions aimed to enhance safety and efficiency of roadways in different geological and geomechanical conditions of mineral mining.

1. Rules of technical exploitation of mines, fields and pits, participating in mining of deposit of nonferrous, rare and precious metals. Moscow : Nedra, 1981. 109 p.
2. SP 91.13330.2012. Underground mine workings (SNiP II-94-80). Moscow : Minregion Rossii, 2012. 54 p.
3. Bogomolov A. N., Abramov G. A., Bogomolova O. A., Pristanskov A. A., Ermakov O. V. Numerical and model experiments to determine the stability of a homogeneous slope undermined with a horizontal production. Vestnik PNIPU. Stroitelstvo i arkhitektura. 2018. Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 30–41.
4. Deere D. U., Deere D. W. Rock Quality Designation (RQD) after Twenty Years : Report GL-89-1. Viksburg, 1989. 101 p.
5. Abichequer L. A., De Souza L. E., Trombetta M. C., Fabrício J. F. Indicator kriging applied to RMR geomechanical modelling in a Pb-Zn deposit case study. International Engineering Journal. 2021. Vol. 74, No. 2. pp. 245–251.
6. Lamamra A., Neguritsa D. L., Bedr S., Reka A. A. Determination and quality classification of rock mass of the Diatomite mine, Algeria. Izvestiya Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo gornogo universiteta. 2021. No. 1(61). pp. 17–24.
7. Barton N. TBM performance estimation in rock using QTBM. Tunnels and Tunnelling International. 1999. Vol. 31, No. 9. pp. 30–34.
8. Cornet F. H. Elements of Crustal Geomechanics. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2015. 461 p.
9. Using the Q-system. Rock mass classification and support design : Handbook. Oslo : NGI, 2015. 55 p.
10. Bulychev N. S. Mechanics of underground structures : Textbook. 2^nd enlarged and revised edition. Moscow : Nedra, 1994. 382 p.
11. Bekezhanov E. B., Shaposhnik Yu. N., Neverov S. A., Neverov A. A., Konurin A. I. Justification of reinforcement sheet application in rock mass stability estimation by the NGI Q-system. Gornyi zhurnal Kazakhstana. 2016. No. 5. pp. 26–34.
12. Raimzhanov B. R., Khasanov A. R. Ratings of structural rock mass quality for Zarmitan gold mines. GIAB. 2020. No. 5. pp. 115–127.
13. Eremenko V. A., Aynbinder I. I., Patskevich P. G., Babkin E. A. Assessment of the state of rocks in underground mines at the Polar division of Norilsk Nickel. GIAB. 2017. No. 1. pp. 5–17.
14. Amusin B., Koshelev V. Evaluation of mechanical characteristics of rock mass for design of underground construction. Future Development of Rock Mechanics : Proceedings of the ISRM Regional Symposium EUROCK 2015 & 64^th Geomechanics Colloquium. Salzburg, 2015. pp. 523–528.
15. Chernov A. Yu., Buzov S. A. Application of rock mass quality ratings and classifications in the framework of the common paperwork of underground openings. Ecological and Economic Nature Management Balance in Mining Regions : Proceedings of Annual Session of the Scientific Council on Geoecology, Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Sergeev’s Lectures). Perm : Permskiy gosudarstvennyi natsionalnyi issledovatelskiy universitet, 2019. Iss. 21. pp. 603–608.
16. Naithani A. K. Rock Mass Classification and Support Design using the Q-System. Journal of the Geological Society of India. 2019. Vol. 94. pp. 443.
17. Nguyen Van Min, Eremenko V. A., Sukhorukova M. A., Shermatova S. S. Influence exerted by underground excavation shape and by effective stresses on the formation of a tensile strain zone at a depth greater than 1 km. GIAB. 2020. No. 6. pp. 67–75.
18. Fadeev A. B. Finite element method in hydromechanics. Moscow : Nedra, 1987. 221 p.
19. Eremenko V. A., Ainbinder I. I., Marysyuk V. P., Nagovitsyn Yu. N. Guidelines for selecting ground support system for the Talnakh operations based on the rock mass quality assessment. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2018. No. 10. pp. 101–106. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2018.10.18
20. Xia-Ting Feng. Rockburst: Mechanisms, Monitoring, Warning, and Mitigation. Cambridge : Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017. 570 p.
21. Makarov A. B. Practical geomechanics: tutorial for mining engineers. Moscow : Gornaya kniga, 2006. 391 p.