Journals →  Eurasian Mining →  2022 →  #1 →  Back

EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS
ArticleName Modeling impact fracture of rock by hydraulic hammer pick with regard to its bluntness
DOI 10.17580/em.2022.01.15
ArticleAuthor Bolobov V. I., Chupin S. A., Le-Thanh B.
ArticleAuthorData

Saint Petersburg Mining University, Saint Petersburg, Russia:

Bolobov V. I., Senior Researcher, Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, boloboff@mail.ru
Chupin S. A., Associate Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences

 

Vinacomin—Institute of Energy and Mining Mechanical Engineering (IEMM), Hanoi, Viet Nam:
Le-Thanh B., Senior Researcher

Abstract

Destruction of rocks and artificial composites is carried out in various ways. One of the most common methods is the impact fracture. The conical pick of JCB HM380 hydraulic breaker was used as the impact tool. The experimental study of rock fracture was carried out on an artificial composite—concrete. The depth of penetration of the pick into concrete was used as the test parameter. The model was based on the model of Professor V. B. Sokolinsky. The model developed in this work takes into account the degree of bluntness of the tool insingle and multiple impact. The system was considered as a two-component system due to the high stiffness of the pick–granite contact (as against the hammer piston–pick stiffness). The wave processes in the pick were disregarded because of the small length of the pick. The pick penetration depth in rocks was calculated theoretically, using the developed mathematical model, at each impact of the pick, and then was compared with the experimental data. The fracture tests also used JCB HM380 breaker and concrete. The penetration depth was determined from the step-frame analysis of video filming of the process. It is found that the pick blunting causes a monotonic increase in the rock resistance to the pick penetration, both in single and multiple impact, while the depth of the tool penetration and the blow time decrease (as compared with the initial state of the tool, by 28% and 20%, respectively).

keywords Hydraulic hammer, pick, bluntness, penetration, granite, mathematical model, impact parameters
References

1. Nedosekin A. O., Rejshahrit E. I., Kozlovskiy A. N. Strategic approach to assessing economic sustainability objects of mineral resources sector of Russia. Journal of Mining Institute. 2019. Vol. 237. pp. 354–360.
2. Gabov V. V., Zadkov D. A., Nguen Kh. L. Features of elementary burst formation during cutting coals and isotropic materials with reference cutting tool of mining machines. Journal of Mining Institute. 2019. Vol. 236. pp. 153–161.
3. Fomin K. V. Method for estimating the spectrum density of the resistance moment on the working body of a peat milling unit. Journal of Mining Institute. 2020. Vol. 241. pp. 58–67.

4. Yungmeister D. A., Lavrenko S. A., Yacheikin A. I., Urazbakhtin R. Y. Improving the shield machine cutter head for tunneling under the conditions of the Metrostroy Saint Petersburg mines. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2020. Vol. 15, No. 11. pp 1282–1288.
5. Lebedeva Y. A., Kotiukov P. V., Lange I. Y. Study of the geoecological state of groundwater of metropolitan areas under
the conditions of intensive contamination thereof. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 2020. Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 157–165.
6. Mikhailov A. V., Rodionov E. A., Zvonarev I. E. Analysis of conditions for vertical cutting of peat. GIAB. 2019. No. 1. pp. 48–54.
7. Yungmeister D. A. Reserch of modernized perforator-hammer for drifting special roadway the underground mines Metrostroy. Journal of Mining Institute. 2016. Vol. 218. pp. 281–288.
8. Klishin V. I., Gerike B. L., Nikitenko S. M., Krestovozdvizhensky P. D. Types and causes of failure of tangential-rotary cutter bits. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2016. No. 7. pp. 92–95. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2016.07.20
9. Aleksandrov V. I., Kibirev V. I., Serzhan S. L. The effectiveness of polyurethane coatings on internal surfaces of slurry lines in tailings slurry hydrotransport systems. Obogashchenie Rud. 2020. No. 4. pp. 35–41. DOI: 10.17580/or.2020.04.06
10. Sementsov V. V., Prokopenko S. A., Ludzish V. S., Abramov V. V. Design and industrial testing of innovative nonexpen dable picks for cutter-loaders. Eurasian Mining. 2019. No. 2. pp. 59–63. DOI: 10.17580/em.2019.02.13
11. Fedorova L. V., Ivanova Yu. S., Voronina M. V. Improvement of threaded joint reliability by means of electromechanical processing. Journal of Mining Institute. 2017. Vol. 226. pp. 456–461.
12. Fedorov S. K., Fedorova L. V., Ivanova Yu. S. et al. Increasing the wear resistance of adapters and drill pipes by electromechanical processing. Journal of Mining Institute. 2018. Vol. 233. pp. 539–546.
13. Zhabin A. B., Polyakov A. V., Averin E. A. et al. Estimation of abrasiveness impact on the parameters of rock-cutting equipment. Journal of Mining Institute. 2019. Vol. 240. pp. 621–627.
14. Korotkov V. A., Lipatov A. G., Vesnin A. M. Innovative technologies for repair-and-renewal maintenance and life extension for parts and units of mining and processing equipment. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2015. No. 8. pp. 83–87. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2015.08.17
15. Korneev V. A., Korneev P. A., Krestovozdvozhensky P. D., Pugachev E. V. Improvement of drilling cutter design. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2020. No. 12. pp. 67–70. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2020.12.15
16. Sinev S. V. Rock drillability and the most efficient drilling tool selection. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2018. No. 12. pp. 59–64. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2018.12.12
17. Kallel M., Zouch F., Antar Z. et al. Hammer premature wear in mineral crushing process. Tribology International. 2017. Vol. 115. pp. 493–505. DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2017.06.025
18. Ushakov L. S., Kamanin Yu. N. Stress–strain analysis of rock mass in fracture by shearing percussion tool. Gornoe Oborudovanie i Elektromehanika. 2008. No. 4. pp. 40–42.
19. Lagunova Yu. A. Working out the mathematical model of the process destroying mining rocks “In layer”. Gornoe Oborudovanie i Elektromehanika. 2008. No. 11. pp. 38–43.
20. Zedgenizov V. G., Melnikov A. V. Modeling work process of impactor in fracture of rocks and strong building materials. Gornoe Oborudovanie i Elektromehanika. 2008. No. 2. pp. 39–43.
21. Chupov I. V. Interrelation of specific energy of rock fracture and unit blow energy. Izvestie Vuzov. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2006. No. 5. pp. 66–69.
22. Zedgenizov V. G., Al-Sakkaf Khaled Saed Taha. Some regularities of destruction of rocks at shock interaction of the wedgeshaped tool with not dimension. Gornoe Oborudovanie i Elektromehanika. 2012. No. 8. pp. 28–31.
23. Grantmyre I., Hawkes I. High-energy impact rockbreaking. CIM Bulletin. 1975. pp. 63–70.
24. Mahyera A., McDonald R. C., Koenning T. H. Predicting performance of joy Heftiimpactors for secondary breaking. Proceedings of the 14th Canadian Rock Mechanics Symposium, Vancouver, CIM special. 1982. No. 30. pp. 59–63.
25. Afrouz A., Hassani F. P. An investigation into rock breaking by direct impact. Mining Science and Technology. 1987. Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 167–176.
26. Bilgin N., Yazici S., Eskikaya S. A. Model to predict the performance of roadheadersand impact hammers in tunnel drivages. Proceedings, Eurock 96, Torino. 1996. pp. 715–720.
27. Bilgin N., Kuzu C., Eskikaya S. Cutting performance of jack hammers and roadheaders in Istanbul metro drivages. Proceedings, World Tunnel Congress, Wienna. 1997. pp. 455–460.
28. Bilgin N., Dincer T., Copur H. The performance prediction of impact hammers from Schmidt hammer rebound values in Istanbul metro tunnel drivages. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology. 2002. Vol. 17, No 3. pp. 237–247. DOI: 10.1016/S0886-7798(02)00009-3
29. Khoreshok A., Mametiev L., Tsekhin A., Borisov A. Relationship between the power of the two-bit cutting body rotation drive of the roadheader and hardness of broken rock. 3rd International Innovative Mining Symposium : E3S Web of Conferences. 2018. Vol. 41(54). DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20184103017
30. Prokopenko S. A., Vorobiev A. V. Recovery of worn-out picks in rock breaking. Eurasian Mining. 2018. No 1. pр. 27–30. DOI: 10.17580/em.2018.01.06
31. Wayment W. R., Grantmyre I. P. Development of a high blow energy hydraulic impactor. Proceedings of the Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference. 1976. pp. 611–626.
32. Aksoy C. O. Performance prediction of impact hammers by block punch index for weak rock masses. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2009. Vol. 46, No. 8. pp. 1383–1388.
33. Aksoy C. O. An Updated Formula and Method to Predict the Performance of Impact Hammers. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2013. Vol. 61. pp. 289-295.
34. Aksoy C. O. Proposed chart for the selection of impact hammer. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2014. No. 68. pp. 120–127.
35. Bolobov V. I., Le Than Bin., Plaschinski V. V Crack propagation in rock upon impact. Obogashchenie Rud. 2019. No. 6. pp. 3–9. DOI: 10.17580/or.2019.06.01
36. Dvornikov L. T., Klishin V. I., Nikitenko S. M., Korneev V. A. Experimental designs of a combined tool using superhard composite materials for effective destruction of mine rocks. Eurasian Mining. 2018. No. 1. pp. 22–26. DOI: 10.17580/em.2018.01.05
37. Sokolinsky V. B. Percussion machines. Moscow : Mashinostroenie, 1982. 185 p.
38. Shelkovnikov I. G. Utilization of blow energy in drilling. Moscow : Nedra, 1977. 160 p.
39. Stavrigin A. N., Tarasov B. G. Experimental physics and mechanics of rocks. Saint Petersburg : Nauka, 2001. 343 p.

Full content Modeling impact fracture of rock by hydraulic hammer pick with regard to its bluntness
Back