Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia:

A. I. Zhukova, Associate Professor at the Department of Physical and Colloid Chemistry, Candidate of Chemical Sciences, e-mail: pylinina-ai@rudn.ru
S. G. Chuklina, Junior Researcher at the Department of Physical and Colloid Chemistry, Candidate of Chemical Sciences, e-mail: sofyaogan@gmail.com
Yu. A. Fionov, 2^nd Year Master’s Student, Intern Researcher at the Department of Physical and Colloid Chemistry, e-mail: fionovyuri@gmail.com
D. A. Osaulenko, 1^st Year Doctoral Student, Intern Researcher at the Department of Physical and Colloid Chemistry, e-mail: dinaosa@yandex.ru

The impregnation technique was used to produce a range of copper catalysts with different concentrations of copper and with a complex-oxide ceramic carrier 50% (Zr + Ce)O₂ – 50% Al₂O₃. The characterization was done based on X-ray phase analysis and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). BET method was used to measure the specific surface area. The catalysts were tested in aqueous solutions of ethanol of different concentrations. The EPR method helped establish that copper(II) oxide only is present on the surface of the catalyst after it has been heat treated in inert atmosphere, while copper ions form during catalysis. Copper was found to change its forms during catalysis and interact with the Ce³⁺ ions of the carrier in the case of the specimen with a high concentration of copper. The results showed that the activity of the catalysts is governed by the concentration of copper in the specimen and their prior processing. To obtain a high-performance dehydrogenation catalyst, the optimum amount of deposited copper phase is 5–10%. The resultant catalysts can be effectively used for the dehydrogenation of aqueous solutions of ethanol in the temperature range of 320 to 360 ^oC. The highest amount of acetaldehyde was observed on the specimen with 5 wt % copper without prior reduction treatment: 76% at Т = 380 ^oC with a 98% selectivity. Hydrogen flow reduction of the catalyst affects its catalytic activity bringing it down by 10–15%. The presence of water in ethanol does not impact the catalytic acti vity of the catalysts. The output of acetaldehyde in ethanol conversions with 50 wt % is higher than in ethanol conversions with 96.6 wt %.
The EPR study was carried out at the Nanochemistry and Nanomaterials Shared Knowledge Centre at the Lomonosov Moscow State University as part of the University’s Development Plan. The authors thank senior researcher A. V. Fionov, PhD (Chemistry), for his support.
This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation under Research Project No. 22-29-01135.

1. Sagar G. V. Dispersion and reactivity of copper catalysts supported on Al₂O₃ – ZrO₂. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2006. Vol. 28, Iss. 110. pp. 13881–13888.
2. Chang F.-W., Kuo W.-Y., Lee K.-C. Dehydrogenation of ethanol over copper catalysts on rice husk ash prepared by incipient wetness impregnation. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2003. Vol. 246, Iss. 2. pp. 253–264.
3. Qing-Nan Wang, Lei Shi, An-Hui Lu. Highly selective copper catalyst supported on mesoporous carbon for the dehydrogenation of ethanol to acetaldehyde. Chem. Cat. Chem. 2015. Vol. 7. pp. 2846–2852.
4. Alikin E. A., Bochkarev S. Yu., Denisov S. P., Danchenko N. M., Rychkov V. N. et al. Developing a thermally stable system Аl₂О₃ – Сe_0,75Zr_0,25O₂ for use in three-way automobile catalysts. Kataliz v promyshlennosti. 2012. No. 2. pp. 25–34.
5. Chang-Yi L. I., Wang J., Tsai Sh., Wang J., Tsai T. Catalysis of Ce_xZr_1–xO₂ for di-iso-propyl-ether hydration. Journal of Rare Earths. 2014. Vol. 32, Iss. 9. pp. 860–866.
6. Chen H., Ye Z., Cui X., Shi J., Yan D. A novel mesostructured alumina – ceria – zirconia tri-component nanocomposite with high thermal stability and its three-way catalysis. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2011. Vol. 143, Iss. 2. pp. 368–374.
7. Liotta L. F., Longo A., Pantaleo G., Di Carlo G., Martorana A. et al. Alumina supported Pt(1%)/Ce_0.6Zr_0.4O₂ monolith: Remarkable stabilization of ceria – zirconia solution towards CeAlO₃ formation operated by Pt under redox conditions. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2009. Vol. 90. pp. 470–477.
8. Pylinina A., Chuklina S., Ahmedova L., Podzorova L. Design of nanomaterials based on complex Al – Zr – Ce-oxides for bio ethanol transformations. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management – SGEM. Conference proceedings. 2017. Vol. 17, No. 61. pp. 105–110.
9. Zhukova A. I., Chuklina S. G., Maslenkova S. A. Study of Cu modified Zr and Al mixed oxides in ethanol conversion: The structure-catalytic activity relationship. Catalysis Today. 2021. Vol. 379. pp. 159–165.
10. Hanukovich S., Dang A., Christopher P. Influence of metal oxide support acid sites on Cu-catalyzed nonoxidative dehydrogenation of ethanol to acetaldehyde. ACS Catalysis. 2019. Vol. 9, Iss. 4. pp. 3537–3550.
11. Qing-Nan Wang, Lei Shi, Wei Li, Wen-Cui Li, Rui Si et al. Cu supported on thin carbon layer-coated porous SiO₂ for efficient ethanol dehydrogenation. Catalysis Science & Technology. 2018. Vol. 8. pp. 472–479.
12. Zhang H., Tan H.-R., Jaenicke S., Chuah G.-K. Highly efficient and robust Cu catalyst for non-oxidative dehydrogenation of ethanol to acetaldehyde and hydrogen. Journal of Catalysis. 2020. Vol. 389. pp. 19–28.
13. Pampararo G., Garbarino G., Riani P., Garcíae M. V., Escribano V. S. A study of ethanol dehydrogenation to acetaldehyde over supported copper catalysts: Catalytic activity, deactivation and regeneration. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2020. Vol. 602. pp. 117–129.
14. Podzorova L. I., Chuklina S. G., Ilyicheva A. A., Konovalov A. A., Penkova O. I. et al. Frame catalysts of the Al₂O₃ – ZrO₂ – CeO₂ system. Perspektivnye materialy. 2018. No. 3. pp. 65–71.
15. Podzorova L. I., Ilyicheva A. A., Mikhaylina N. A., Shevchenko V. Ya., Shvorneva L. I. Phases forming in the ZrO₂ – Al₂O₃ – CeO₂ system in various conditions. Neorganicheskie materialy. 2002. Vol. 38, No. 12. pp. 51–57.
16. Ilyichev A. N., Firsova A. A., Korchak V. N. Understanding the reaction behind oxidation of CO in excess H₂ on CuO/CeO₂ catalysts using EPR and TPD methods. Kinetics and Catalysis. 2006. Vol. 47, No. 4. pp. 602–609.
17. Shinkarenko V. G., Anufrienko V. F. A spectroscopic study of bivalent copper and its state in a copper-magnesium oxide catalyst. Theoretical and Experimental Chemistry. 1976. Vol. 2, No. 2. pp. 270–274.
18. Soria J., Conesa J. C., Martinez-Arias A., Coronado J. M. ESR study of the clustering of Cu ions on the ceria surface in impregnated CuO/CeO₂. Solid State Ionics. 1993. Vol. 63–65. pp. 755–761.
19. Ribeiro M. C., Jacobs G., Davis B. H., Mattos L. V., Noronha F. B. Ethanol steam reforming: higher dehydrogenation selectivities observed by tuning oxygen-mobility and acid/base properties with Mn in CeO₂·MnO_x·SiO₂ catalysts. Topics in Catalysis. 2013. Vol. 56. pp. 1634–1643.
20. Morales M. V., Asedegbega-Nieto E., Bachiller-Baeza B., Guerrero-Ruiz A. Bioethanol dehydrogenation over copper supported on functionalized graphene materials and a high surface area graphite. Carbon. 2016. Vol. 102. pp. 426–436.