Design & Survey and Research & Development Institute of Industrial Technology JSC, Moscow, Russia:

V. A. Tolkachev, Principal Specialist, Candidate of Technical Sciences
D. V. Maynikov, Head of the Laboratory, Candidate of Technical Sciences, e-mail: didima06@mail.ru
N. P. Paskhin (1930–2021)
E. Yu. Meshkov, Head of the Laboratory

One of the key stages in the in-situ leaching of uranium includes thickening of yellow cake slurry to obtain washed uranium concentrate. Russian in-situ leaching sites tackle this by using membrane filter presses. In spite of their high performance, filter presses have one major drawback – the filtration is done periodically. This paper describes the results of a laboratory study suggesting that, together with membrane filter presses, continuous band vacuum filters could also be used in this application. The yellow cake slurry obtained after precipitation of ammonium polyuranate from Dalur JSC’s eluates has the density of 1060–1065 kg/m³. In laboratory conditions, the slurry was thickened by adding 1 g/dm³ of Praestol 2530 slurry. The settling rate was 5.4 m/h, the thickening performance – 2.8 t/(m^2.day). The resultant thickened product with a density of 1600 kg/m³ was filtered in a band filter with a three-stage counter-current washing cycle at a fresh water flow rate of 1 m³/t solid and a vacuum of –49 kPa. The process resulted in an average filtration performance of 8–9 t/(m^2.day) and a 17–18 mm thick washed precipitate with 41–43% humidity. The duration of the overall filtration and washing cycle was 110–140 sec. The maximum concentration of sulphate-ion in the washed and dried yellow cake precipitate did not exceed 2.0%, which is significantly lower than the 4% allowed. It is noted that, if necessary, these indicators can be improved by raising the rinse water flow rate.

1. Solodov I. N., Morozov A. A. Physico-chemical geotechnology as the key growth path in uranium industry. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2017. No. 8. pp. 5–10. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2017.08.01.
2. Svyatetskiy V. S., Polonyankina S. V., Ermakov A. G. Russia’s uranium industry: Current status and prospects. Razvedka i okhrana nedr. 2017. No. 11. pp. 22–26.
3. Shahjadi Hisan Farjana, Nazmul Huda, Parvez M. A., Lang C. Comparative life-cycle assessment of uranium extraction processes. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018. Vol. 202. pp. 666–683.
4. Balikhin A. V. Available uranium resources: Current status and prospects. Review. Kompleksnoe ispolzovanie mineralnogo syrya. 2019. No. 1. pp. 36–50.
5. Boytsov A. V. Global uranium industry: Status, prospects, current challenges. Razvedka i okhrana nedr. 2017. No. 11. pp. 4–8.
6. Lutsenko N. I., Ravshanov N. M. Uranium mining and processing by in-situ leaching. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2016. No. 10. pp. 13–18. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2016.10.02.
7. Guskov A. S., Kutikov M. P., Paskhin P. N. Designing uranium mining sites in the territory of Russia. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii estestvennykh nauk. 2013. No. 6. pp. 158–165.
8. Jingzhen Zhang, Qinyan Yue, Chao Xia, Kunlun Yang The study of Na₂SiO₃ as conditioner used to deep dewater the urban sewage dewatered sludge by filter press. Separation and Purification Technology. 2017. Vol. 174. pp. 331–337.
9. Stickland A. D., Skinner S. J., Cavalida R. G., Scales P. J. Optimisation of filter design and operation for wastewater treatment sludge. Separation and Purification Technology. 2018. Vol. 198. pp. 31–37.
10. Moruzzi R. B., Oliveira A. L., Conceicao F. T. Fractal dimension of large aggregates under different flocculation conditions. Science of the Total Environment. 2017. Vol. 609. pp. 807–814.
11. Ajao V., Bruning H., Rijnaarts H. Natural flocculants from fresh and saline wastewater: comparative properties and flocculation performances. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2018. Vol. 349. pp. 622–632.
12. He W., Xue L., Gorczyca B. Experimental and CFD studies of floc growth dependence on baffle width in square stirred-tank reactors for flocculation. Separation and Purification Technology. 2018. Vol. 190. pp. 228–242.