ArticleName |
Numerical study of the stress-strain state of steels for
use in building structures of metallurgical shops |
ArticleAuthorData |
Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs, Vladimir, Russia
M. V. Lukin, Cand. Eng., Associate Prof., Dept. of Building Structures, e-mail: lukin_mihail_22@mail.ru D. A. Chibrikin, Cand. Eng., Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Building Structures, e-mail: dachibrikin@outlook.com
S. I. Roshchina, Dr. Eng., Prof., Head of the Dept. of Building Structures, e-mail: rsi3@mail.ru
Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs, Vladimir, Russia1 ; Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan, China2 ; National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”, Moscow, Russia3 V. B. Deev*, Dr. Eng., Prof., Chief Researcher1, Expert Prof. at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Automation2, Prof. at the Dept. of Metal Forming3, e-mail: deev.vb@mail.ru
* Corresponding author. |
Abstract |
Scientific and technological progress in the field of construction is closely related to the problems of development and improvement of steel products and structures. The introduction of lightweight metal structures is important for the development of industrial construction technologies for the workshops of metallurgical enterprises. Reduction of the weight of structures leads to lower transportation costs and simplified installation. To further improve the process of design, manufacture and installation of lightweight metal structures, a combination of optimal material characteristics is necessary. In the production of metal structures, low-carbon steels are usually used. This study suggests the possibility and feasibility of increasing efficiency through the use of steels of other grades (St2sp, St3sp, 30, 45, 40Kh, 65G). Steels of various grades were considered, their stress-strain state (SSS) under the influence of static loads was studied, and their influence on the strength and deformability of metal structures was assessed. The study substantiates the theoretical possibility of using other grades of steel to create a building structure, which makes it possible to expand the range of steel structures in general. Numerical studies were carried out in the calculation software package Lira 10.12, taking into account the linear physical model of the materials under study, which makes it possible to estimate the actual stress-strain state ofstr uctures considering variations in steel grades. The use of other grades of steel enables to increase the strength of a steel structure by 1.52–22.44 % and reduce deformability by 3.5–35.47 %. According to the results of the study, St65G steel was recommended as a material for metal structures, the use of which in the manufacture of tensile truss elements makes it possible to reduce their overall material consumption by reducing the size of the cross sections. In this regard, there is a scientifically based possibility of reducing the cost of structures while maintaining their load-bearing capacity. The work was carried out within the framework of the state assignment in the field of scientific activity of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (topic FZUN-2020-0015, state assignment of VlSU). The research was carried out using the equipment of the interregional multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary center for the collective use of promising and competitive technologies in the areas of development and application in industry/mechanical engineering of domestic achievements in the field of nanotechnology (agreement No. 075-15-2021-692 of August 5, 2021). |
References |
1. Tkadlečková M. Numerical modelling in steel metallurgy. Metals. 2021. Vol. 11. 885. DOI: 10.3390/met11060885 2. Chairunnisa N., Satyarno I., Muslikh M., Aminullah A. Parametrical study in non-linear numerical analysis of a coupling beam with steel truss configuration in shear wall system. Int. Rev. Civ. Eng. 2019. Vol. 10, Iss. 4. 197. DOI: 10.15866/irece.v10i4.16813 3. Yi C. P., Nordlund E., Zhang P., Warema S. et al. Numerical modeling for a simulated rockburst experiment using LS-DYNA. Underground Space. 2021. Vol. 6, Iss. 2. pp. 153–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.undsp.2019.11.002 4. Hadjipantelis N., Kyvelou P., Gardner L., Wadee M. A. Numerical modelling of prestressed composite cold-formed steel flooring systems. Adv. Eng. Mater. Struct. Syst. Innov. Mech. Appl. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Struct. Eng. Mech. Comput. 2019. DOI: 10.1201/9780429426506-185 5. Queheillalt D. T., Wadley H. N. G. Cellular metal lattices with hollow trusses. Acta Mater. 2005. Vol. 53, Iss. 2. pp. 303–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.024 6. Fahmy M. F. M., Sayed A. H., Farghal O. A., Ahmed A. E. M. Flexural behavior of new hybrid profiled steel-FRP T-beams filled with concrete: Development and validation. J. Compos. Constr. 2020. Vol. 24, Iss. 2. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001007 7. Hussein A., Hao L., Yan C., Everson R. et al. Advanced lattice support structures for metal additive manufacturing. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2013. Vol. 213, Iss. 7. pp. 1019–1026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.01.020 8. Shahsavari V., Mehrkash M., Santini-Bell E. Damage detection and decreased load carrying capacity assessment of a vertical-lift steel truss bridge. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 2019. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001400 9. Reda M., Sharaf T., ElSabbagh A., ElGhandour M. Behavior and design for component and system of cold-formed steel roof trusses. Thin-Walled Structures. 2019. Vol. 135. Iss. 4. pp. 21–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.10.038 10. Rashed M. G., Ashraf M., Mines R. A. W., Hazell P. J. Metallic microlattice materials: A current state of the art on manufacturing, mechanical properties and applications. Mater Des. 2016. Vol. 95. pp. 518–533. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.146 11. Nedelcu M., Chira N., Cucu H. L., Popa A. G. Buckling mode decomposition of thin-walled members with holes. Res. Appl. Struct. Eng. Mech. Comput. Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Struct. Eng. Mech. Comput. SEMC 2013. 12. Rodríguez-Martínez J. A., Rusinek A., Arias A. Thermo-viscoplastic behaviour of 2024-T3 aluminium sheets subjected to low velocity perforation at different temperatures. Thin-Walled Structures. 2011. Vol. 49, Iss. 7. pp. 819–832. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2011.02.007 13. Deng N., Zhou X., Zhou M., Peng S. Numerical simulation of the melting behavior of steel scrap in hot metal. Metals. 2020. Vol. 10. 678. 14. Wang Y., Feng J., Yang S., Li J. Measurement of surface velocity in a 150 mm×1270 mm slab continuous-casting mold. Metals. 2020. Vol. 10. 428. 15. Fan J. W., Xie R. P., Wang Y. C., Liu T. H. Fatigue behavior of plain C – Mn steel plates with fine grained ferrite in surface layers. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2012. Vol. 539. pp. 154–162. 16. Zou X., Zhao D., Sun J., Wang C. et al. An integrated study on the evolution of inclusions in EH36 shipbuilding steel with Mg addition: From casting to welding. Metall. Mater. Trans. B. 2018. Vol. 49. pp. 481–489. 17. Auer V. Quickly developing countries require more and more steel. Chernye Metally. 2013. No. 4. pp. 75–78. 18. Zangeneh S., Lashgari H. R., Alsaadi S., Mohamad-Moradi S. et al. The effect of cyclic solution heat treatment on the martensitic phase transformation and grain refinement of Co – Cr – Mo dental alloy. Metals. 2020. Vol. 10. 861. DOI: 10.3390/met10070861 19. Liu Z., Song B., Yang Z., Cui X. et al. Effect of cerium content on the evolution of inclusions and formation of acicular ferrite in Ti–Mg-killed EH36 steel. Metals. 2020. 10. 863. DOI: 10.3390/met10070863 20. Popova M., Sergeev M., Lukina A., Shunqi M. Strength and deformability of lightweight metal trusses with elements from cut I-beams. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020. Vol. 896. 012061. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/896/1/012061 21. Volkova V. E., Makarova A. A. Numerical modeling of the stress-strain state of a beam with a flexible wall. Metallicheskie konstruktsii. 2011. Vol. 17. No. 4. pp. 261–269. 22. Ringhofer M., Wimmer G., Plaul J. F. et al. Transition of the steelmaking industry to digital technologies. Chernye Metally. 2018. No. 3. pp. 12–17. 23. GOST380–2005. Common quality carbon steel. Grades. Introduced: 01.07.2008. 24. GOST 1050–2013. Metal products from nonalloyed structural quality and special steels. General specification. Introduced: 01.01.2015. 25. GOST 4543–2016. Structural alloy steel products. Specifications. Introduced: 01.10.2017. 26. GOST 14959–2016. Spring nonalloy and alloy steel products. Specifications. Introduced: 01.01.2018. 27. GOST 26020–83. Hot-rolled steel I-beam with parallel flange edges. Introduced: 01.01.1986. |