ArticleName |
Justification of reinforcement technology and
operating conditions for permanent ore passes in faulted rock
mass in Oktyabrsky Mine |
ArticleAuthorData |
NorNickel’s Polar Division, Norilsk, Russia
V. P. Marysyuk, Chief Geotechnical Engineer—Director, Center for Geodynamic Safety, Candidate of Engineering Sciences S. Yu. Shilenko, Deputy Director of Production Safety and Labor Protection
Gipronickel Institute, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
A. V. Trofimov, Head of Geotechnique Laboratory, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, trofimovav@nornik.ru A. D. Kulagin, Researcher, Geotechnique Laboratory |
Abstract |
Deep-level mines in the Norilsk industrial area, including Oktyabrsky Mine, use various systems of mining. In view of substantial production output of ore (round 5 Mt/yr), it is required to ensure technological capability of uninterrupted ore drawing for the subsequent processing and conversion. In this regard, it is critical to maintain efficient operation of ore passes. The most frequent causes and events of damage of ore pass support and disintegration of enclosing rock mass are discussed. A variant of ore pass support is proposed, which meets the criteria of economy and applicability of the advanced mine support and rock reinforcement technologies in NorNickel’s mines. Oktyabrsky Mine introduces a support technology for permanent ore passes, with a complex ground support and reinforcement system: friction rock stabilizers 3 m long with reinforcement mixture injection; single steel mesh 100×100 mm; nonmetallic fiber-reinforced shotcrete 150 mm thick; urea silicate-based resin injection using packers. Application of this technology can make it possible to abandon segmental lining which is very expensive and ineffective in elimination of arching by blasting. Heading operations have already been started, and it is expected to evaluate shortly the economic effect and real-life serviceability of the new support type in mines in the Norilsk industrial area. |
References |
1. Operational performance : Annual report. 2021. PJSC MMC Norilsk Nickel, 2022. Available at: https://ar2021.nornickel.ru/business-overview/operational-performance#norilsk (accessed: 10.10.2023). 2. Sredniawa W., Skawina B., Garcia J. R., Rapp J. Analyzing degradation of ore pass walls in Kiirunavaara mine using scanning data. Frontiers in Built Environment. 2023. Vol. 9. ID 1250671. 3. Hadjigeorgiou J., Lessard J. F., Mercier-Langevin F. Ore pass practice in Canadian mines. The Journal of The South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 2005. Vol. 105, No. 11. pp. 809–816. 4. Sredniawa W., Skawina B., Rapp J., Shekhar G., Gunillasson J. Longevity chart for planning production and the renovation of orepasses. Caving 2022 : Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Block and Sublevel Caving. Perth : Australian Centre for Geomechanics, 2022. pp. 369–380.
5. Parhusip A., Hutauruk B., Meigy E., Widodo A. M. Use of drones with LiDAR technology in PT. Freeport Indonesia underground mines. Prosiding TPT XXX Kongres XI Perhapi. Jakarta, 2021. 6. Esmaieli K., Hadjigeorgiou J., Grenon M. Stability analysis of the 19a ore pass at Brunswick Mine usi ng a two-stage numerical modeling approach. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 2013. Vol. 46, Iss. 6. pp. 1323–1338. 7. Sergunin M. P., Darbinyan T. P., Shilenko S. Yu., Grinchuk I. P. Digital surface modeling of an ore pass to reveal orientation of principal stresses and effect of rock fracturing. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2020. No. 6. pp. 28–32. 8. Lyle R. R. Considerations for lar ge-diameter raise-boring. Underground Mining Technology : Proceedings of the First International Conference. Perth : Australian Centre for Geomechanics, 2017. pp. 581–595. 9. Eberhardt E. Review: Geotechnical Design in Highly Stressed Brittle Rock. 2016. Available at: https://www.eoas.ubc.ca/courses/eosc547/lecture-material/Part3-SupplementaryNotes.pdf (accessed: 14.11.2023). 10. Edelbro С., Brummer R., Pierce M., Sandström D., Sjöberg J. Ra iseboring in difficult rock conditions. Ground Support 2019 : Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Ground Support in Mining and Underground Construction. Perth : Australian Centre for Geomechanics, 2019. pp. 185–197. 11. Marysyuk V. P., Shilenko S. Yu., Trofimov A. V., Rumyantsev A. E. Empirical approach to ore pass geometry justification in Talnakh mines. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2021. No. 10. pp. 26–32. 12. Bunker K. A., Campbel l A. D., O’Toole D., Penney A. Guidelines for orepass design in a sublevel cave mine. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Design Methods in Underground Mining. Perth : Australian Centre for Geomechanics, 2015. pp. 585–600. 13. Marysyuk V. P., Shilenko S. Yu., Trofimov A. V., Kuzmin S. V. Risk assessment in main ore chute construction in difficult geological conditions based on integrated geotechnical research. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2020. No. 1. pp. 62–66. 14. Kokoev S. G., Yusupov G. A., Feoktistov A. Yu., Trofimov A. V., Rumyantsev A. E. et al. Substantiation of the main ore pass parameters based on discrete-element modeling. MIAB. 2019. Special issue 37. Digital technologies in mining. pp. 158–167. 15. Balek A. E., Kharisov T. F., Ozornin I. L. Accounting of influence of geodinamic movings during groove construction for grinding and draining complex. Problemy nedropolzovaniya. 2023. No. 1. pp. 6–15. 16. Using the Q-system. Rock mass classification and support design : Handbook. Oslo : NGI, 2015. 54 p. 17. Sienkiewicz K. Conventional Facilities Update. FS Integration/Installatio n Planning : Presentation materials. 2020. Available at: https://indico.cern.ch/event/862992/contributions/3649046/ (accessed: 15.12.2023). 18. Gardner L. J., Fernandes N. D. Ore pass rehabilitation—Case studies from I mpala Platinum Limited. The Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 2006. Vol. 106, No. 1. pp. 17–23. 19. Hadjigeorgiou J., Mercier-Langevin F. Estimating ore pass longevity in hard rock mines. 42nd US Rock Mechanics Symposium, 2nd US-Canada Rock Mechanics Symposium. San Francisco, 2008. 20. McCracken A., Stacey T. R. Geotechnical risk assessment for large-diameter raise-bored shafts. Shaft Engineering : Conference. London : Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, 1989. pp. 309–316. 21. Sonnov M. A., Trofimov A. V., Rumyantsev A. E., Shpilev S. V. Application of numerical and block geomechanical modelling to determine parameters of large-section chambers. Gornaya promyshlennost. 2021. No. 2. pp. 127–131. |