Journals →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2024 →  #9 →  Back

APPLIED MINING AND OIL-FIELD GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS
ArticleName Oil and gas potential of ancient Riphean sediments of the East European Platform (Mezen syneclise) based on basin analysis
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2024.09.02
ArticleAuthor Peskov D. V., Prishchepa O. M., Zharkov A. M.
ArticleAuthorData

Empress Catherine II Saint-Petersburg Mining University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

D. V. Peskov, Post-Graduate Student
O. M. Prishchepa, Head of Department, Professor, Doctor of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences, prischepa_om@pers.spmi.ru
A. M. Zharkov, Professor, Doctor of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences

Abstract

Oil and gas reservoirs of ancient sediments is one of the critical areas of increasing hydrocarbon resources. The study area located in the European part of the north-east of the East European Platform, characterized by extremely low and uneven geological and geophysical knowledge, has repeatedly attracted attention as an area with ambiguous prospects for oil and gas content. Repeated attempts have been made to estimate the local oil and gas potential using the information, methods and technologies available in all those years. Seismic exploration works in 2010–2011 in the White Sea water area, where an extension of a series of tectonic structures from land—ancient rifts of the Mezen syneclise—was revealed, and processing of drilling logs from Middle Nyafta well 21 allowed a more systematic view of the structure of the ancient Riphean age strata and, with regard to earlier research analyses and generalizations, enabled an attempt to assess the oil and gas prospects using modern technologies of basin modeling. The main distinctive feature of the Mezen syneclise is the three-layer structure of the sedimentary cover, consisting of synrift, syneclise and plate complexes. The sedimentary cover is composed of the Upper Proterozoic (Middle and Upper Riphean), Vendian–Cambrian and Paleozoic rocks. In general, while the thickness of the Vendian–Cambrian and Paleozoic sediments is small and the oil and gas potential of these sediments is estimated to be extremely low, the thickness of the Middle Upper Riphean sediments is 3–5 km onshore and reaches 6 and more kilometers in the water area, which makes it possible to assess them as an independent area of study.

keywords Basin modeling, oil-and-gas source strata, Precambrian oil and gas capacity, Mezen syneclise, White Sea, Mezen–White Sea tectonic block, Middle Nyafta well
References

1. Dmitrieva D., Romasheva N. Sustainable development of oil and gas potential of the Arctic and its shelf zone: The role of innovations. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2020. Vol. 8, Iss. 12. ID 1003.
2. Carayannis E., Ilinova A., Chanysheva A. Russian Arctic offshore oil and gas projects: Methodological framework for evaluating their prospects. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2020. Vol. 11. pp. 1403–1429.
3. Romasheva N., Dmitrieva D. Energy resources exploitation in the Russian Arctic: Challenges and prospects for the sustainable development of the ecosystem. Energies. 2021. Vol. 14, Iss. 24. ID 8300.
4. Fauzer V. V., Smirnov A. V. The World’s Arctic: Natural resources, population distribution, economics. Arktika: Ekologia i Ekonomika. 2018. Vol. 31, Iss. 3. рр. 3–22.
5. Egorov A. S., Prischepa O. M., Nefedov Yu. V., Kontorovich V. A., Vinokurov I. Y. Deep structure, tectonics and petroleum potential of the western sector of the Russian Arctic. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2021. Vol. 9, Iss. 3. ID 258.
6. Gusev E. A. Results and prospects of geological mapping of the Arctic shelf of Russia. Journal of Mining Institute. 2022. Vol. 255. pp. 290–298.
7. ROSNEDRA infor ms on available economic oil reserves to last for 21 years in Russia. 2021. Available at: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/12385703 (accessed: 28.02.2024).
8. Ilinova A., Solovyova V., Yudin S. Scenario-based forecasting of Russian Arctic energy shelf development. Energy Reports. 2020. Vol. 6, Suppl. 9. pp. 1349–1355.
9. Chanysheva A., Ilinova A. The future of Russian arctic oil and gas projects: Problems of assessing the prospects. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2021. Vol. 9, Iss. 5. ID 528.
10. Cherepovitsyn A. E., Tretyakov N. A. Development of new system for assessing the applicability of digital projects in the oil and gas sector. Journal of Mining Institute. 2023. Vol. 262. pp. 628–642.
11. Cherepovitsyn A., Rutenko E., Solovyova V. Sustainable development of oil and gas resources: A system of environmental, socio-economic, and innovation indicators. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2021. Vol. 9, Iss. 11. ID 1307.

12. Gavrilov V. P., Dvoretskiy P. I., Dunaev V. F., Ponomarev V. A., Rudnev A. N. Geology and Oil and Gas Content of the Moscow and Mezen Syneclises. Moscow : Gazprom, 2000. 157 p.
13. Baluev A. S., Zhuravlev V. A., Terekhov E. N., Przhiyalgovsky E. S. Tectonics of the White Sea and adjacent areas (The explanatory notes to The Tectonic Map of the White Sea and Adjacent Areas at a Scale of 1:1 500 000). Moscow : GEOS, 2012. 104 p.
14. Bashkova S. E., Karaseva T. V., Gorbachev V. I. General problems of prognosis for oil and gas content availability of Riphean-Vendian deposits in the European part of Pussia. Geologiya, geofizika i razrabotka neftyanykh i gazovykh mestorozhdeniy. 2012. No. 7. pp. 25–32.
15. Kelly A. E., Love G. D., Zumberge J. E., Summons R. E. Hydrocarbon biomarkers of Neoproterozoic to Lower Cambrian oils from eastern Siberia. Organic Geochemistry. 2011 . Vol. 42, Iss. 6. pp. 640–654.
16. Dvoynikov M.V., Budovskaya M.E. Development of a hydrocarbon completion system for wells with low bottomhole temperatures for conditions of oil and gas fields in Eastern Siberia. Journal of Mining Institute. 2022. Vol. 253. pp. 12–22.
17. Lezhnin D. S., Afanasenkov A. P., Sobolev P. N., Naidenov L. F. Riphean–Palaeozoic series in the Khatanga–Lena interfluve: Geological structure and petroleum potential. Geologiya Nefti i Gaza. 2021. No. 4. pp. 7–28.
18. Kozhanov D. D., Bolshakova M. A., Khopta I. S., Mordasova A. V., Stoupakova A. V. et al. Geology and geochemistry of Riphean–Vendian petroleum system (the northern part of the Volga-Ural Basin). Georesursy. 2021. Vol. 23, Iss. 2. pp. 73–86.
19. Sobornov K. O. Structure of the South Urals and Cis-Uralian foredeep as revealed by interpretation of regional seismic data and the origin of the prolific of oil reserves in the Volga–Ural Basin. Geologiya Nefti i Gaza. 2023. No. 1. pp. 7–25.
20. Pimenov B. V. Geological structure and oil and gas potential of the Mezen syneclise : Theses of Dissertation of Candidate of Geologo-Mineralogical Sciences. Syktyvkar, 1994. 18 p.
21. Aplonov S. V., Burzin M. B., Weiss A. F., Vladimirova T. V., Gorbachev V. I. et al. Geodynamics and Possible Oil and Gas Content of the Mezen Sedimentary Basin. Saint-Petersburg : Nauka, 2006. 319 p.
22. Zhuravlev V. A., Kuprin V. F., Lukyanova L. I. et al. State Geological Map of the Russian Federation. Scale 1:1 000 000 (3rd Generation). Mezen Series. Sheet Q-38 — Mezen. Explanatory Note. Saint-Petersburg : VSEGEI, 2012. 311 p.
23. Baluev A. S., Zhuravlev V. A., Przhiyalgovskii E. S. New data on the structure of the central part of the White Sea paleorift system. Doklady Earth Sciences. 2009. Vol. 427A, No. 6. pp. 891–896.
24. Kazanin G., Zhuravlev V., Pavlov S. The structure of the sedimentary cover and prospects of the oil and gas potential of the White Sea. Burenie i neft. 2006. No. 2. pp. 26–28.
25. Semenova L. R., Rybalko A. E., Zhuravlev V. A. State Geological Map of the Russian Federa tion. Scale 1:1 000 000 (3rd Generation). Baltic Series. Sheet Q-37—Arkhangelsk. Geological Map of Quaternary Sediments. Saint-Petersburg : VSEGEI, 2012.
26. Ustinov V. N., Mikoev I. I., Piven G. F. Prospecting models of primary diamond deposits of t he north of the East European Platform. Journal of Mining Institute. 2022. Vol. 255. pp. 299–318.
27. Baluev A. S. Geodynamics of the Riphean Stage in the evolution of the northern passive margin of the East European Craton. Geotectonics. 2006. Vol. 40, No. 3. pp. 183–196.
28. Egorov A.S. Deep structure and composition characteristics of the continental Earth’s crust geostructures on the Russian Federation territory. Journal of Mining Institute. 2015. Vol. 216. pp. 13–30.
29. Shvartsman Yu. G., Popov Yu. A., Romushkevich R. A., Rassomakhin V. Ya., Shirobokov V. N. et al. Recent data on the rmal condition of Mesensky syneclise received from 21 Srednenyaftinsk bore hole. Izvestiya vuzov. Geologiya i razvedka. 2004. No. 5. pp. 33–37.
30. Zharkov A. M., Bazhenova T. K., Shibina T. D. Comparative Estimate of Origination and Accumulatio n of Hydrocarbons in Basal Sediments of the Russian and Siberian Platforms : Geological Report. Saint-Petersburg : VNIGRI, 1998. 140 p.
31. Makarevich V. N., Zharkov A. M. Predictive Appraisal of Oil and Gas Content of the Mezen Syneclis e and Pre-Timan Downfold : Geological Report. Saint-Petersburg : VNIGRI, 2001. 209 p.
32. Malov A. I. Primary composition of vendian rocks of the Mezen syneclise. Doklady Earth Sciences. 2003. Vol. 392, No. 7. pp. 968–972.
33. Malov A. I. Water–rock interaction in Vendian sandy–clayey rocks of the Mezen syneclise. Lithology and Mineral Resources. 2004. Vol. 39, No. 4. pp. 345–356.
34. Bazhenova T. K. Рroblem of petroleum potential of basal horizons in the basins of ancient platforms i n aspect of their katagenetic evolution. Neftegazovaya geologiya. Teoriya i praktika. 2008. Vol. 3, No. 3.
35. Vakhnin M. G. Level of exploration and prospects of hydrocarbon potential of Mezen syneclise. Geologiya, geofizika i razrabotka neftyanykh i gazovykh mestorozhdeniy. 2016. No. 2. pp. 8–13.
36. Prischepa O. M., Kireev S. B., Nefedov Yu. V., Martynov A. V., Lutsky D. S. et al. Theoretical and meth odological approaches to identifying deep accumulations of oil and gas in oil and gas basins of the Russian Federation. Frontiers in Earth Science. 2023. Vol. 11. DOI: 10.3389/feart.2023.1192051

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back