Journals →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2024 →  #11 →  Back

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
ArticleName Ecological and geochemical features of aeration zone in rural areas in regions of influence of large mining facilities
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2024.11.16
ArticleAuthor Budarina V. A., Ignatenko I. M., Kosinova I. I.
ArticleAuthorData

Voronezh State University, Voronezh, Russia

V. A. Budarina, Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor


Belgorod State University, Belgorod, Russia

I. M. Ignatenko, Director of the Institute of Earth Sciences, Candidate of Engineering Sciences, Associate Professor

I. I. Kosinova, Head of Department, Doctor of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences, Professor, kosinova777@yandex.ru

Abstract

Mining facilities are significant sources of pollution caused to the components of environment. In the central part of Russia, the world’s largest deposit of ferruginous quartzites is being exploited at depths from 50 to 250 m. Productive strata and overburden contain heavy metals that are foreign to soil on ground surface. The purpose of this work was to study the range of impact exerted by pollutants on adjacent areas. The object of study was the Bykovskoe rural settlement in the Belgorod Region, located 140 km away from the facilities of the Stoilensky and Lebedinsky GOKs and 10 km off the mines of Yakovlevsky GOK. The soil structure of the Bykovskoe rural settlement is represented by black soil with a predominance of ‘typical’ chernozems. The ecological and geochemical studies of soils and subsoils revealed a permissible level of their pollution. However, it was found that the concentration of elements such as Cr, Va, Ba, Zn at all points of soil sampling was, though insignificantly, but higher than the background value. Nickel content is similar at all sampling points and ranges from 29.71 to 41.09 mg/kg. In addition to the excess in nickel, an increased concentration of cobalt was also detected. The analysis of the content of heavy metals in soils demonstrates their permissible level, and exceedances are only found for arsenic and cobalt. This circumstance makes it possible to determine the threat radius of impact exerted by large mining facilities on soils in adjacent areas, which is at least 140 km. Engineering and environmental surveys within the delineated zone allow determining the genesis of some heavy metals in soils free from direct industrial impact. The results obtained should be taken into account when developing recommendations on ecological and geochemical monitoring during engineering and environmental surveys.
The study was supported within the framework of the Priority 2030 Program, Project No. 20180180 Ecosystem Reproduction and Management on Agrolandscapes.

keywords Ecological and geochemical assessment, soils, subsoils, rural settlement, radius, impact, mining facility
References

1. Carter S. K., Haby T. S., Meineke J. K., Foster A. C., McCall L. E. et al. Prioritizing science efforts to inform decision making on public lands. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2023. Vol. 21, Iss. 10. pp. 453–460.
2. Zenkov I. V., Kiryushina E. V., Vokin V. N., Maglinets Yu. A. Review of global trends in meeting the ecological challenges of the mining industry. Part I: International research. Eurasian Mining. 2022. No. 1. pp. 90–94.
3. Budarina V. A., Ignatenko I. M., Kosinova I. I. Features of soil contamination of rural settlements in the central part of the Belgorod region with heavy metals. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Geologiya. 2023. No. 4. pp. 113–121.
4. Avramenko P. V., Akulov P. G., Atanov Yu. G., Belousova A. I., Vakulenko A. G. et al. Natural Resources and Environment in the Belgorod Region. Belogorod : Izdatelstvo BelGU, 2007. 556 p.
5. Chmykhalova S. V. Effectiveness evaluation of mining as a natural and technical system with a decrease in the content of a useful component of the ore-raw material base. Eurasian Mining. 2021. No. 2. pp. 36–40.
6. Golik V. I., Polukhin O. N., Petin A. N., Komaschenko V. I. Environmental problems of working out of ore deposits of Kursk Magnetic Anomaly. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2013. No. 4. pp. 91–94.
7. Budarina V. A., Lisetsky F. N., Kosinova I. I. Transformation of ecological-resource and ecological-geochemical functions of the lithosphere within the Stary Oskol–Gubkin mining district of the Kursk Magnetic Anomaly. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2022. No. 11. pp. 57–62.
8. Masson-Delmotte V., Zhai P., Pirani A., Connors S. L., Péan K. et al. Climate Change 2021. The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers : Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2021. 40 p.
9. McDuffie E. E., Smith S. J., O’Rourke P., Tibrewal K., Venkataraman C. et al. A global anthropogenic emission inventory of atmospheric pollutants from sector- and fuelspecific sources (1970–2017): An application of the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS). Earth System Science Data. 2020. Vol. 12, Iss. 4. pp. 3413–3442.
10. Lukin S. V. Monitoring of agroecological condition of arable soils of the Central Chernozem Region of Russia. Eurasian Soil Science. 2023. No. 4. pp. 67–77.
11. Utekhin D. N. (Ed.). Geology, Hydrogeology and Iron Ores in the Kursk Magnetic Anomaly. Volume 1. Geology. Book 2. Depositional Sequence. Moscow : Nedra, 1972. 360 p.
12. Wang F., Zhou Y., Fu X., Zhao Y., Wen Y. et al. Analysis and assessment on the heavy metals in a severely degraded subtropical red soil region. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2024. Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 110–121.
13. Rydgren K., Halvorsen R., Töpper J. P., Auestad I., Hamre L. N. et al. Advancing restoration ecology: A new approach to predict time to recovery. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2019. Vol. 56, Iss. 1. pp. 225–234.
14. Zhuikov D. V. Monitoring of the content of trace elements (Mn, Zn, Co) in agrocenoses of the south western part of the Central Chernozem region of Russia. Zemledelie. 2020. No. 5. pp. 9–13.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back