Журналы →  Eurasian mining →  2024 →  №2 →  Назад

MINERAL GEOLOGY AND EXPLORATION
Название Rock-Eval analysis of source rock parameters in the Aryskum depression of the South Turgay Basin, Kazakhstan
DOI 10.17580/em.2024.02.05
Автор Madisheva R. K., Akhmetov D., Tileuberdi N., Fedotenko V. S.
Информация об авторе

Abylkas Saginov Karaganda Technical University, Karaganda, Kazakhstan

Madisheva R. K., Acting Associate Professor, PhD

 

JV Kazgermunai LLP, Kyzylorda, Kazakhstan

Akhmetov D., Head of Department

 

Satbayev University, Almaty, Kazakhstan

Tileuberdi N., Associate Professor, n.tileuberdi@satbayev.university

 

Academician Melnikov Research Institute of Comprehensive Exploitation of Mineral Resources—IPKON, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Fedotenko V. S., Deputy Director of Science, Head of Department, Doctor of Engineering Sciences

Реферат

The study is aimed at identifying potential oil and gas source strata at the Upper–Middle Jurassic clay deposits based on Rock-Eval pyrolysis data on samples taken at the East and Central Akshabulak deposits (Aryskum depression, South Turgay Basin, Kazakhstan). The data on the total organic carbon content (TOC), residual generation potential of organic matter (S2) on the pyrogram, productivity index (PI), oxygen and hydrogen indicators (HI & OI) and maximum pyrolysis temperature (Tmax) are summarized. However, only the East Akshabulak samples were used to assess hydrocarbon potential as the TOC of the Central Akshabulak rocks was less than 0.3%. The analysis results of the East Akshabulak rocks show that the S2 parameter of generation potential varied from satisfactory (0.58 and 2.48 mg HC/g) to very good (3.84 mg HC/g). In addition, it was found that the concentration of TOC 0.78 has a satisfactory generation potential, and the samples taken at the depths of 1960.9 and 1967.65 m have a very good oil and gas generation potential. The type of organic matter was also evaluated using the HI and the Tmax, which allowed concluding that the test samples contained type III kerogen, characterized by the release of mostly gaseous hydrocarbons. The thermal maturity of organic matter was also determined based on the values of Tmax and PI: by PI the test rocks were classified as immature, however the temperature values of the samples taken at the depths of 1960.9 and 1965.98 m pointed at their early stage of maturity.

The research was supported by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Grant Agreement No. AP13268843.

Ключевые слова Organic geochemistry, oil and gas content, oil generation, Rock-Eval pyrolysis, Aryskum depression, South Turgay Basin
Библиографический список

1. Ponomarev A A., Gafurov M. R., Kadyrov M. A. et al. Impact of geomagnetic fields on the geochemical evolution of oil. Processes. 2022. Vol. 10, Iss. 11. ID 2376.
2. Madisheva R. K., Portnov V. S., Amangeldiyeva G. B. et al. Geochemical prerequisites for the formation of oil and gas accumulation zones in the South Turgay depression, Kazakhstan. Acta Geochimica. 2023. Vol. 43. pp. 520–534.
3. Ponomareva Ye. V., Yermolov P. V., Portnov V. S. Age and geodynamic of the Irtysh shear zone. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. 2018. No. 6. pp. 13–19.
4. Madisheva R. K. Investigation of the geodynamic situation of sedimentation and formation of oil and gas potential of the pre-Jurassic complex of the Aryskum trough: Cand. Tech. Sci. Dissertation, Karaganda : Karaganda Technical University, 2020. 99 p.
5. Turkov O. S., Kuantaev N. E., Kulumbetova G. E., Esenaly D. D. Atlas of Oil and Gas Fields of the Republic of Kazakhstan (in two volumes). 2020. Almaty, Vol. 1, 392 p., Vol. 2, 416 p.
6. Sanghamitra P., Divya M., Neha A., Shreerup G. Assessment of the source rock potential in the Sirka and Giddi collieries of South Karanapura coalfield, Jharkhand, India: Insights from megaflora, palynology, and geochemistry. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences India. 2024. Vol 12. ID 100181.
7. Daukeev S. Zh., Uzhkenov B. S., Abdulin A. A. et al. Deep structure and mineral resources Kazakhstan. Oil and Gas. Almaty, Kazakhstan. 2002. Vol. 3. 248 p.
8. Dembicki H. Jr. Three common source rock evaluation errors made by geologists during prospect or play appraisals. AAPG Bulletin. 2009. Vol. 93, No. 3. pp. 341–356.
9. Hart B. S., Steen A. S. Programmed pyrolysis (Rock-Eval) data and shale paleoenvironmental analyses: a review. Interpretation. 2015. Vol. 3(1), pp. SH41-SH58.
10. Agbor F. A., Mhlambi S., Teumahji N. A., Sonibare W. A., van Bever Donker J. M. Petroleum source rock potential evaluation: A case study of block 11a, Pletmos sub-basin, offshore South Africa. Journal of Petroleum Exploration Production Technology. 2023. Vol. 13. pp. 995–1007.
11. Rezai R. Petroleum Geology. Alavi edition, 2002. 479 p.
12. Tissot B. P., Welte D. H. Formation and Occurrence of Oil. Second ed. New York : Springer, 1984. 699 p.
13. Azhgaliev D. K., Karimov S. G., Isaev A. A. Regional study is the next important stage in evaluation of oil and gas industry potential of sedimentary basins of Western Kazakhstan. Georesources. 2018. Vol. 20(1). pp. 16–24
14. Zholtayev G. Zh. Theoretical foundations on estimation of oil and gas potential perspectives of paleosoic sedimentary basins of Kazakhstan. News of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Series of Geology and Technical Sciences. 2018. Vol. 2, No. 428. pp. 185–192.
15. Azhgaliev D. K., Zaidemova Zh. K., Amangeldieva G. B., Demeuova A. B. Formation of reef complexes of sediments and features of oil and gas potential of the South Turgay basin. Oil and Gas. 2023. Vol. 4, No. 136. pp. 41–55.
16. Peters K. E., Cassa M. R. Applied source rock geochemistry. The Petroleum System–From Source to Trap: AAPG Memoir. 1994. Vol. 60. pp. 93–120.
17. Tissot B. P., Espitalie J. L’evolution thermique de la matière organique des sédiments: applications d’une simulation mathématique. Potentiel pétrolier des bassins sédimentaires de reconstitution de l’histoire thermique des sédiments. Oil & Gas Science and Technology-revue De L Institut Francais Du Petrole. 1975. Vol. 30, Iss. 5. pp. 743–778.
18. Peters K. E. Guidelines for evaluating petroleum source using programmed pyrolysis. AAPG Bulletin. 1986. Vol. 70, Iss. 3. pp. 318–329.
19. Gogoi K., Dutta M. N., Das P. K. Source rock potential for hydrocarbon generation of Makum coals, Upper Assam, India. Current Science. 2008. Vol. 95(2). pp. 233–239.
20. Metaksa G. P., Alisheva Zh. N., Metaksa A. S., Fedotenko N. A. Scientific and technical fundamentals of changing the properties of hydrocarbons in conditions of optimal subsoil use. Eurasian Mining. 2023. No. 2. pp. 75–79.
21. Leckie D. A., Kalkreuth W. D., Snowdon L. R. Source rock potential and thermal maturity of Lower Cretaceous strata, Monkman Pass area, British Columbia. AAPG Bulletin. 1988. Vol. 72(7). pp. 820–838.
22. Seithaziyev Y. Sh. Geochemical studies of condensate, gas and core samples derived from gas-condensate fields in the Moynkum sag (Kazakhstan). News of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Series of Geology and Technical Sciences. 2023. Vol. 3, No. 459. pp. 242–261.
23. Seitkhaziyev Y. Sh., Uteev R. N., Mustafaev M. K. et al. Fingerprinting and biomarker analysis of oil of the Akshabulak group to determine the types of oil. Bulletin of the oil and gas industry of Kazakhstan. 2021. Vol. 3, No. 4. pp. 91–108.
24. Seitkhaziyev Y. Sh., Uteev R. N., Mustafaev M. K. et al. The use of biomarkers and oil fingerprinting to decipher the genetic affiliation of oil and predict the ways of oil migration at the Nuraly field. Bulletin of the oil and gas industry of Kazakhstan. 2021. Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 61–75.
25. Peters K. E., Walters C. C., Moldowan J. M. The Biomarker Guide Vol. 1: Biomarkers and Isotopes in the Environment and Human History. 2nd Edition. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2005.
26. Lafargue E., Marquis F., Pillot D. Rock–Eval 6 applications in hydrocarbon exploration, production, and soil contamination studies. Oil and Gas Science and Technology. 1998. Vol. 53(4). pp. 421–437.
27. Majid S., Mohammad R. K., Hossein R. et al. Organic geochemistry, oil-source rock, and oil-oil correlation study in a major oilfield in the Middle East. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2021. Vol. 207(9). ID 109074.
28. Bocai L., Youjun T., Zhonghong Ch., Yifeng W., Daxiang H., Kai Ya., Lin Ch. The geochemical characteristics of source rock and oil in the Fukang Sag, Junggar Basin. NW China. Minerals. 2023. Vol. 13, No. 3. ID 432.
29. Madisheva R. K., Serebrennikova O. V., Isaev V. I., Portnov V. S., Ozdoev S. M. Composition of biomarkers and origin of oils of the Aryskum depression (South Kazakhstan). Bulletin of Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Asset Development. 2020. Vol. 331, No. 7. pp. 116–130.
30. Melenevsky V. N. Methodological recommendations for the use of pyrolytic modeling methods in organic geochemistry. Novosibirsk : SNIGGIMS, 1991. 48 p.

Полный текст статьи Rock-Eval analysis of source rock parameters in the Aryskum depression of the South Turgay Basin, Kazakhstan
Назад