ArticleName |
Expediency of outsourcing in mining industry |
ArticleAuthorData |
Priargunsky Industrial Mining and Chemical Union, Krasnokamensk, Russia:
D. I. Ilderov, Technical Officer, IlderovDI@ppgho.ru |
Abstract |
At the present time, mining industry is the basis of Russian economy since the gross of the national budget (60–70%) is generated on the ground of the data on mineral reserves and their production planning. With regard to the keystone role of the mining industry in the economic development of Russia, it is possible to state that the change in the status of Russian mining industry proportionally revises the exponents of national GDP. With the higher performance in mineral mining, the quantitative changes in GDP structure become better observable. Increasingly more mining companies in Russia use the third-party risk strategy. In practice is engagement of contracting agencies to execute secondary processes on a contract basis, or outsourcing. The companies that use outsourcing obtain such benefits as the total concentration at the key product, strategic management, cutting-down of direct costs in the structure of the end product cost, simplification of control, upsurge of liquidity of assets, etc. Modeling business-processes enabled simplification of the mining process control, which enhances efficiency of a mine. Commonly used abroad, outsourcing has good prospects for the development in mines in Russia. It is possible to create a separate service market for the mining industry in Russian economy by analogy with the oil service market. Outsourcing in mining will enable using modern tools of production control and apply advanced mineral mining technologies. |
keywords |
Outsourcing, mining industry, efficiency, stripping, expediency, mine infrastructure area, mining company, risk assessment |
References |
1. Kalendzhyan S. O. Outsourcing and delegation of authority in the companies’ activity. Moscow : Delo, 2003. 272 p. 2. Kalendzhyan S. O. Outsourcing: delegation of management in the company development strategy. Moscow: Katalog, 2001. 260 p. 3. Kalendzhyan S. O. Outsourcing as a mean of increasing of business effectiveness. Vestnik universiteta. Seriya “Institutsionalnaya ekonomika”. 2002. No. 2(4). pp. 47–66. 4. Rodkina T. A. Information logistics. Moscow : Ekzamen, 2001. 287 p. 5. Heywood J. B. The Outsourcing Dilemma. The Search for Competitiveness. Pearson Education Ltd., 2001. 223 p. 6. Antonov G. D., Ivanova O. P. Centralization of marketing in integrated companies: necessity and efficiency. Marketing v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2002. No. 4. Available at: http://www.mavriz.ru/articles/2002/4/356.html (accessed: 15.06.2017). 7. Maley J. F., Kowalkowski C., Brege S., Biggemann S. Outsourcing Maintenance in Complex Process Industries: Managing Firm Capabilities in Lock-in Effect. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 2015. Vol. 27. No. 5. pp. 801–825. Available at: https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/157183/Maley_et_al._postprint_2015_.pdf?sequence=5 (accessed: 15.06.2017). 8. Steenkamp C. J. H., van der Lingen E. Outsourcing in the mining industry: decision-making framework and critical success factors. The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 2014. Vol. 114. pp. 845–854. 9. Outsourcing for engineers. Chernye Metally. 2011. No. 7-8. p. 96. 10. Tserenbaljir Baatartogtokh. State of outsourcing in the mining industry: an overview. A thesis submitted in partial fulfi llment of the requirements for the degree of master of applied science. Vancouver : The University of British Columbia, 2016. 73 p. 11. Freytag P. V., Clarke A. H., Evald M. R. Reconsidering outsourcing solutions. European Management Journal. 2012. Vol. 30. Iss. 2. pp. 99–110. 12. Govorova N. V. Natural values and modernization of Russian economy: Norwegian experience for Russian Federation. Learning environment today and tomorrow. VIII International scientific and practical conference : collection of scientific proceedings. Moscow : MTI «VTU», 2013. pp. 324– 325. 13. Kokueva Zh. M., Smirnov O. A. Will the wholesale replace the Sate Logistics Committee? Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo. 2000. No. 12. pp. 48–51. 14. Outsourcing: creation of high-efficient and competitive organizations : tutorial. Ed.: B. A. Anikin. Moscow : Infra-M, 2003. 187 p. 15. Bogdanova I. N. Outsourcing as an instrument of optimization of business-processes for mining enterprises. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten. 2014. No. 3. pp. 199–202. 16. Sabanov A. Analysis of workability of risk assessment methods in autentification processes with remote electronic impact. Elektrosvyaz. 2014. No. 5. pp. 44–47. Available at: https://www.aladdin-rd.ru/company/pressroom/articles/41285/ (accessed: 15.04.2017). 17. State Standard GOST R 51901.11-2005. (MEK 61882:2001). Risk management. Hazard and operability studies. Application guide. Introduced: 01.01.2006. Moscow : Standartinform, 2006. 46 p. 18. Popov M. S. Methodical basis of control of the choice of outsourcing instruments during the mine ral deposit mining. Gornyy informatsionno-analiticheskiy byulleten. 2016. No. 9. pp. 273–283. 19. Vaynshteyn V. Russian outsourcing reflected in the world experience. Software developers alliance, 2005. Available at: http://www.silicontaiga.ru/home.asp?artId=3836 (accessed: 20.03.2014). |