Journals →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2020 →  #5 →  Back

DEVELOPMENT OF DEPOSITS
ArticleName Justification of optimal parameters for hybrid open pit/underground gold mining
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2020.05.05
ArticleAuthor Oganesyan A. G., Alaverdyan A. A., Karslyan S. S.
ArticleAuthorData

National Polytechnic University of Armenia, Erevan, Armenia:

A. G. Oganesyan, Head of Chair, Professor, Doctor of Engineering Sciences, hov_armen@mail.ru
A. A. Alaverdyan, Associate Professor, Candidate of Engineering Sciences

 

Lernametallurgiai Institute, Ereva n, Armenia:

S. S. Karslyan, Senior Researcher

Abstract

The Sotk gold deposit in Armenia features very difficult geological and geotechnical conditions: it is represented by steeply dipping and thick lodes and mineralized dykes, thin lodes and veins at a considerable depth, which dictates using hybrid open pit/underground mining. Under such conditions, optimi zation and justification of hybrid open pit/underground mining reduces identification of the boundary between open pit and underground mines and validation of optimal underground mine parameters. The boundary between open pit and underground mine areas is determined from the equality of the limiting and perimeter stripping ratios: it is expedient to use open pit mining method down to a depth of 2250 m and underground mining method beyond the limits of the open pit mine. The recommendatio ns for mining beyond the limits of the open pit mine include:
– in case of an ore body or its parts to 3 m thick: top downward mining by slices, with armored concrete floor between slices and with ore haulage by scrapers; in case of an ore body more than 3 m thick: systems of top downward mining by slices with cemented backfill, with self-propelling equipment;
– in case of an ore body or its parts thicker than 8 m, with gold content to 2 g/t: sublevel caving; in case
of gold content of ore more than 2 g/t: systems of top downward mining by slices with cemented backfill.

keywords Mineral deposit, open pit mine, limiting stripping ratio, hybrid open pit/underground mining, mining method, ore, optimal depth.
References

1. Trubetskoy K. N., Galchenko Yu. P. Geoecology of mastering of Earth soils and ecogeotechnology of deposit mining. Moscow : Nauchtekhlitizdat, 2015. 405 p.
2. Galchenko Yu. P., Ivchenko V. V. Management technique of breaking the basic parameters in underground and combined development of complex ore deposits. Pribory i sistemy. Upravlenie, kontrol, diagnostika. 2015. No. 3. pp. 76–79.
3. Rylnikova M. V., Strukov K. I., Olizarenko V. V., Turkin I. S. Energy-efficient technologies in integrated mineral resources development: Prospects for application and estimate of parameters. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2017. No. 11. pp. 71–76. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2017.11.13
4. Trubetskoy K. N., Myaskov A. V., Galchenko Yu. P., Eremenko V. A. Creation and justification of convergent technologies for underground mining of thick solid mineral deposits. Gornyi Zhurnal. 2019. No. 5. pp. 6–13. DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2019.05.01
5. Nabiollah Adibi, Majid Ataee-pour, Mehdi Rahmanpour. Integration of sustainable development concepts in open pit mine design. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015. Vol. 108. pp. 1037–1049.
6. Altushkin I. A., Levin V. V., Gordeev A. I., Pikalov V. A. Development of the Tominsk and Mikheevsk copper ore deposits of the Southern Urals. Tsvetnye Metally. 2019. No. 7. pp. 21–28. DOI: 10.17580/tsm.2019.07.02
7. Erzurumlu S. S., Erzurumlu Y. O. Sustainable mining development with community using design thinking and multi-criteria decision analysis. Resources Policy. 2015. Vol. 46. pp. 6–14.
8. Wang N., Wan B. H., Zhang P., Du X. L. Analysis on deformation development of open-pit slope under the influence of underground mining. Legislation, Technology and Practice of Mine Land Reclamation : Proceedings of the Beijing International Symposium on Land Reclamation and Ecological Restoration. London : Taylor & Francis Group, 2015. pp. 53–58.
9. King B., Goycoolea M., Newman A. Optimizing the open pit-to-underground mining transition. European Journal of Operational Research. 2017. Vol. 257, Iss. 1. pp. 297–309.
10. Galchenko Yu. P., Eremenko V. A., Myaskov А. V., Kosyreva M. A. Solution of geoecological problems in underground mining of deep iron ore deposits. Eurasian Mining. 2018. No. 1. pp. 35–40. DOI: 10.17580/em.2018.01.08
11. Agabalyan Yu. A. Methodology of optimal subsoil management. Vestnik gosudarstvennogo inzhenernogo universiteta Armenii. Ser. Metallurgiya, materialovedenie, nedropolzovanie. 2012. No. 1. pp. 56–65.
12. Oganesyan A. G. Methodical bases for choosing of optimum systems of underground mining of metal deposits. Izvestiya NAN RA. Nauki o Zemle. 2006. Vol. 59, No. 2. pp. 55–60.
13. Karslyan S. S. Selecting an optimal system for underground development of the gold mine in Sotk. Vestnik Natsionalnogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Ser. Metallurgiya, materialovedenie, nedropolzovanie. 2017. No. 1. pp. 99–106.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back