Journals →  Gornyi Zhurnal →  2023 →  #12 →  Back

GEOLOGY, SEARCH AND EXPLORATION OF MINERALS
ArticleName Morphology and evolution of Eastern Arctic structure and geodynamics
DOI 10.17580/gzh.2023.12.04
ArticleAuthor Senin B. V., Kerimov V. Yu., Mustaev R. N., Mamedov R. A.
ArticleAuthorData

Yuzhmorgeologiya, Gelendzhik, Russia

B. V. Senin, Chief Geologist, Doctor of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences

 

Sergo Ordzhonikidze Russian State University for Geological Prospecting, Moscow, Russia

V. Yu. Kerimov, Head of Department, Professor, Doctor of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences, Honored Geologist of the Russian Federation, vagif.kerimov@mail.ru
R. N. Mustaev, Leading Research, Associate Professor, Candidate of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences
R. A. Mamedov, Associate Professor, Candidate of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences

Abstract

The authors aimed at the analysis of the morphology and evolution of the structure and geodynamics in the Eastern Arctic area. It is found that the plate tectonics of the basement in the section of the Eastern Arctic governs the vertical tectonic level structure defined by some indirect signs from the interpretation of seismic exploration data and other geophysical surveys. A huge amount of work connected with ground seismics is performed in the southern (Novosibirsk) depression of the East Siberian Sea in the Russian sector of the Chukotka Sea. The Eastern Arctic water areas are greatly interesting in terms of hydrocarbon resources; on the other hand, appraisal of the hydrocarbon potential of the areas is heavily complicated due to geophysical understudy of the locality and owing to lack of exploration boreholes. In such conditions, the method of analogies is often used. For the Eastern Arctic, the analogy is the reservoirs of the Alaska North Slopes.

keywords Eastern Arctic, basement, Cenozoic sediment, geodynamic analysis, time section, oil and gas content
References

1. Kontorovich V. A., Kontorovich A. E., Gubin I. A., Zoteev A. M., Lapkovsky V. V. et al. The Neoproterozoic–Phanerozoic section of the Anabar–Lena province: Structural framework, geological model, and petroleum potential. Russian Geology and Geophysics. 2013. Vol. 54, No. 8. pp. 980–996.
2. Afanasenkov A. P., Senin B. V., Leonchik M. I. Refinement of petrogeological zonation model of the Russian Arctic shelf in light of modern geological and geophysical data. Geologiya nefti i gaza. 2016. No. 4. pp. 77–88.
3. Sherwood K. W., Craig J. D., Cooke L. W., Lothamer R. T., Johnson P. P. et al. Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources Alaska Federal Offshore. Alaska : U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service, 1998. pp. 94–14.
4. Sherwood K. W., Craig J. D., Cooke L. W., Lothamer R. T., Johnson P. P. et al. Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources Alaska Federal Offshore. Alaska : U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service, 1998. pp. 115–196.
5. Ilhan I., Coakley B. J. Meso–Cenozoic evolution of the southwestern Chukchi Borderland, Arctic Ocean. Marine and Petroleum Geology. 2018. Vol. 95. pp. 100–109.
6. Schenk O., Peters K. E., Magoon L. B., Bird K. J. Petroleum System Modeling of Northern Alaska. Basin Modeling: New Horizons in Research and Applications. AAPG Hedberg Series 4. Tulsa, 2012. pp. 317–338.
7. Grigorev M. N. Morphology and transformation dynamics of submarine permafrost in nearshore–shelf zone of the Laptev and East Siberian Seas. Nauka i obrazovanie. 2006. No. 4. pp. 104–109.
8. Decker P. L. Nanushuk formation discoveries confirm world-class exploration potential in a newly proven stratigraphic play, Alaska North Slope. AAPG ACE 2018 : Discovery Thinking Forum 2018. Utah, 2018.
9. Kerimov V. Yu., Leonov M. G., Osipov A. V., Mustaev R. N., Khai Vu Nam. Hydrocarbons in the basement of the South China Sea (Vietnam) shelf and structural–tectonic model of their Formation. Geotectonics. 2019. Vol. 53, Iss. 1. pp. 42–59.
10. Kerimov V. Y., Osipov A. V., Mustaev R. N., Monakova A. S. Modeling of petroleum systems in regions with complex geological structure. Geomodel-2014 : Proceedings of the 16th EAGE Science and Applied Research Conference on Oil and Gas Geological Exploration and Development. Gelendzhik, 2014. DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20142245
11. Bogoyavlenskiy V. I., Kishankov A. V. Dangerous gas-saturated objects in the World Ocean: The Bering Sea. Burenie i neft. 2018. No. 9. pp. 4–12.
12. Sømme T. O., Dore A. G, Lundin E. R., Tørudbakken B. O. Triassic–Paleogene paleogeography of the Arctic: Implications for sediment routing and basin fill. AAPG Bulletin. 2018. Vol. 102, No. 12. pp. 2481–2517.
13. Houseknech D. W. Petroleum systems framework of significant new oil discoveries in a giant Cretaceous (Aptian–Cenomanian) clinothem in Arctic Alaska. AAPG Bulletin. 2019. Vol. 103, No. 3. pp. 619–652.
14. Kerimov V. Yu., Bondarev A. V. Mustaev R. N., Khoshtariya V. N. Estimation of geological risks in searching and exploration of hydrocarbon deposits. Oil Industry. 2017. No. 8. pp. 36–41.
15. Bogoyavlenskiy V. I., Kerimov V. Yu., Olkhovskaya O. O. Dangerous gas-saturated objects in the World Ocean: The Sea of Okhotsk. Oil Industry. 2016. No. 6. pp. 43–47.

Language of full-text russian
Full content Buy
Back